Collision between the Milky Way and Andromeda and Redshift

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of redshift observations in relation to the approaching collision between the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies. Participants explore whether the Milky Way's motion could affect the interpretation of redshift data from distant galaxies, particularly in the context of the universe's accelerated expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the Milky Way's accelerated movement towards Andromeda might influence redshift observations of other galaxies, potentially leading to misconceptions about the universe's expansion.
  • Another participant counters that the Milky Way's motion cannot account for the observed recession of distant galaxies, as they are receding in all directions at much higher speeds than the Milky Way's approach to Andromeda.
  • There is a mention of "peculiar motion" and its relevance to the discussion, questioning whether local velocities have been adequately considered in cosmological calculations.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the idea that cosmologists have overlooked the local velocity of the Milky Way, citing evidence that contradicts this notion.
  • A later reply indicates that the effect of the Milky Way's approach to Andromeda has already been accounted for in discussions about the universe's accelerated expansion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the Milky Way's motion could affect redshift measurements, with some arguing it cannot while others suggest it might be a factor. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of local velocities on cosmological interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the influence of local motion on redshift measurements and the extent to which this has been factored into cosmological models. The discussion highlights the complexity of interpreting redshift data in the context of local galactic dynamics.

MartinG
Messages
27
Reaction score
4
Hi ! My question is the following:

If there is a redshift in astronomical observations with other galaxies, as our Milky Way galaxy is approaching with the Andromeda galaxy, they must surely be in an accelerated approach due to the force of gravity between the two galaxies, and as our galaxy Vía Milky already be in a accelerated movement, it can influence the redshift that occurs in the observations with the other galaxies.

In other words, it could happen that the redshift that is observed with the other galaxies and that would lead to the conclusion that the universe is expanding in an accelerated way, cannot be confused with this accelerated movement that our galaxy would already have in his approach to the Andromeda galaxy.

I ask just in case. Perhaps this situation is already contemplated in the conclusion that is drawn from the accelerated expansion of the universe when the redshift is observed in the observations with the other galaxies, but I ask this question to remove this doubt.

I thank you for the answers and send you greetings.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't understand a thing you wrote. It sounds like a personal theory, though.

One fact you may be unaware of: M31 is blueshifted.
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: Bandersnatch
I think what you are saying is that the speed of the Milky Way galaxy as it approaches Andromeda could be confusing our measurements of the redshifts of other galaxies. There are several reasons why this is not the case, including these:

(1) We see distant galaxies receding in all directions. There is no way for motion of the Milky Way to cause distant galaxies to appear to be receding from us no matter which direction we look.

(2) Distant galaxies are receding from us at speeds of 50,000 km/sec and greater. The speed with which the Milky Way is approaching Andromeda is only about 100 km/sec.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, Bandersnatch and MartinG
Vanadium 50 said:
I don't understand a thing you wrote.
The question is whether cosmologists have forgotten to include the local velocity of the Milky Way relative to comoving coordinates in their calculations? Is it possible that this subtlely could have been overlooked by generations of cosmologists?

Or, has the OP overlooked the fact that the local velocity of the MIlky Way would lead to anisotropic redshift/blueshift depending on direction, rather than redshift in all directions depending only on distance and not on direction?
 
Last edited:
PeroK said:
The question is
Got it.

While I agree that the hypothesis that generations of cosmologists (and the astronomers before them) are idiots is a difficult one to support, there is also evidence against it. There is evidence that the Earth is moving with respect to the uniform CMBR, it does not point in the direction of M31, and it is 6x larger.
 
If it has already been explained to me that this effect of accelerated approach between the Milky Way and Andromeda is taken into account to explain the accelerated expansion that our universe has at this time.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K