Collision involving angular and linear motion

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block sliding down a frictionless surface and colliding with a vertical rod, leading to an inelastic collision. The participant correctly identifies that linear momentum is not conserved due to an external force acting at the pivot point. They explore the conservation of angular momentum as an alternative approach, realizing that the cross product of the block's linear velocity and its radius from the pivot can be used to find the necessary relationships. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamics of the system during the collision and how to apply conservation laws effectively. The final goal is to determine the angle θ through calculations based on these principles.
GwtBc
Messages
74
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


a small 0.199 kg block slides down a frictionless surface through height h = 0.608 m and then sticks to a uniform vertical rod of mass M = 0.398 kg and length d = 2.23 m. The rod pivots about point O through angle θ before momentarily stopping. Find θ.

point O is at the end of the rod opposite to where the block sticks.

Homework Equations



## KE = mgh ##

## v = \sqrt{2gh} ##

## \omega = \frac{v}{r} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I think I know how to do this but since it's an assignment question I want to make sure my thinking is right.
This is clearly an inelastic collision, so I can't simply equate the initial potential energy of the block to the final PE of the system.

The approach I've taken is to assert that at the instant the block collides with the rod, they'll be moving in the same direction as the block was (since the block is moving horizontally and the rod is simply resting in the vertical position hanging from point O), and linear momentum is conserved until the tension in the rod causes it to change. So the initial linear velocity of the system can be found, hence it's angular velocity and hence it's KE. This energy can then be equated to the final PE. The reason I'm unsure is because if we consider the rod + block system, then the tension is a force from within the system, so how could it affect the momentum?

Here are the equations I've used:

##
v_{1} = \sqrt{2gh} ##

## m_{1}\sqrt{2gh} = (m_{1} + m_{2})v_{2} ##

## \Rightarrow v_{2} = \frac{m_{1}\sqrt{2gh}}{m_{1} + m_{2}} ##

## \omega = \frac{v_{2}}{d} ##

##\Rightarrow KE = \frac{1}{2}I(\frac{m_{1}\sqrt{2gh}}{(m_{1}+m_{2})d})^2 = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3}m_{2}d^2 + m_{1}d^2)(\frac{m_{1}\sqrt{2gh}}{(m_{1}+m_{2})d})^2 ##

##y_{com} = \frac{\frac{1}{2}m_{2}d+m_{1}d}{m_{1} + m_{2}} ##

## KE = (m_{1} + m_{2})gl_{1} ##

## l_{2} = y_{com}-l_{1} ##

##\Rightarrow \theta = \arccos (\frac{l_{2}}{y_{com}})

##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
GwtBc said:
This is clearly an inelastic collision, so I can't simply equate the initial potential energy of the block to the final PE of the system.
Right. Good!

The approach I've taken is to assert that at the instant the block collides with the rod, they'll be moving in the same direction as the block was (since the block is moving horizontally and the rod is simply resting in the vertical position hanging from point O), and linear momentum is conserved until the tension in the rod causes it to change.
Here you need to be careful. Linear momentum of the system in the horizontal direction is only conserved if there is no external horizontal force acting during the collision. However, there is a significant horizontal external force that acts at the pivot. (Try to understand why.) So, linear momentum is not conserved during the collision.

Can you think of another conservation law that you can use for the collision?
 
  • Like
Likes GwtBc
conservation of angular momentum but I don't know the radius of the block's rotation before the collision. If I can find the ratio between ## \omega_{1}## and ##\omega_{2} ## then I can find the ratio between the kinetic energies, then find the energy after the collision and proceed from there? But that method seems to rely a bit too much on fiddling around, so I'm not sure.
 
Have you covered the topic of the angular momentum of a single particle relative to a specified origin?
 
TSny said:
Have you covered the topic of the angular momentum of a single particle relative to a specified origin?
Oh, I think I get it now. The cross product of the block's linear velocity and it's radius from O is just the length of the rod times the linear velocity of the particle. Is that right?
 
GwtBc said:
Oh, I think I get it now. The cross product of the block's linear velocity and it's radius from O is constant and when the collision occurs is when the two are perpendicular so I can essentially take the length of the rod to be r. Is that right?
Yes, that's right.
 
  • Like
Likes GwtBc
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
335
Views
15K