Collisions between two balls in 2d-motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeralda21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Collisions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the collision dynamics between two balls in 2D motion, specifically ball A dropped from a height of 2.0 m and ball B projected at an angle α with an initial speed v_0. The key finding is that for ball B to collide with ball A, the angle α must be 45 degrees, but this requires an infinite initial speed v_0, making it impractical. The equations of motion for both balls were derived, leading to a system of equations that ultimately confirmed the necessity of the angle and speed conditions for collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and equations of motion
  • Familiarity with projectile motion concepts
  • Knowledge of relative velocity principles
  • Basic trigonometry, particularly in right-angled triangles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of relative velocity in collision scenarios
  • Explore advanced projectile motion equations in physics
  • Investigate the effects of varying initial speeds on collision outcomes
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of motion in two dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions and projectile motion in two-dimensional space.

zeralda21
Messages
119
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A ball A is dropped from rest from a
height of 2.0 m above the floor. Meanwhile that ball A is released, an other ball B is pushed away with the starting speed v_0 from the position shown in Figure. Which angle α is needed for B to collide with ball A?

6B3IqsR.png


Homework Equations



Equations of motion which I present below.

The Attempt at a Solution


Yes, one solution is that it does depend on v_0 but a second solution is at an angle 45 degrees, which I want to find.

I lay out the equations in the x/y direction and then determine A/B equations of motion from these.

X: a(t)=0 Y: a(t)=-g
v(t)=v_0cosα v(t)= -gt+v_0sinα
x(t)=v_0cosαt+x_0 y(t)= -1/2gt^2+v_0sinα+s_0

The equations x(t) and y(t) for A and B are now determined;

A: x_1(t) = 1 I have decided that x_0 refers to x_0=0 for B.
y_1(t) = 2-1/2gt^2

B: x_2(t) = v_0cosαt
y_2(t) = 1-1/2gt^2+v_0sinαt

For collision we need that x_1(t)+y_(1)t = x_2(t)+y_2(t) Right?

But that leads to v_0t(cosα+sinα)=v_0t(√2sin(α+π/4))=2 which clearly is impossible for any α...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zeralda21 said:
For collision we need that x_1(t)+y_(1)t = x_2(t)+y_2(t) Right?
You need to rethink the condition for collision.
 
DrClaude said:
You need to rethink the condition for collision.

Well at the point of collision, the x-coordinate and y-coordinate must be equal for A and B at the same time. Hence;

v_0cosα=1
1-1/2gt^2+v_0tsinα=2-1/2gt^2 ⇔ v_0tsinα=1

Thus we end up with the system of equations: \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> v_0\cos\alpha=1 &amp; \\ <br /> v_0t\sin\alpha=1 &amp; <br /> \end{matrix}\right. which clearly does not have solutions.
 
Last edited:
zeralda21 said:
Well at the point of collision, the x-coordinate and y-coordinate must be equal for A and B at the same time. Hence;

v_0cosα=1
You're missing a ##t## in there, from which you can get ##t_c##, the time at collision.
 
Actually, 45 degrees does not seem reasonable at all. Consider the right-angled triangle BAC where C is the point 1 meter below A. It is a triangle with sides 1,1,√2 and angle ABC is 45 degrees. When ball A starts moving downward, the side AC gets smaller and hence the angle gets smaller.

In order for the angle to be 45 degrees, the ball B must hit A immediately and thus requiring that v_0→∞. Is this analysis correct?

Edit;

You're right;
\left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> v_0t\cos\alpha=1 &amp; \\ <br /> v_0t\sin\alpha=1 &amp; <br /> \end{matrix}\right. leads to \tan\alpha=1 \Rightarrow \alpha=\frac{\pi}{4}

In pure interest; What does actually x_1(t)+y_1(t)=x_2(t)+y_2(t) mean geometrically?(In the case that there exist a solution). Yes, totally forgot gravity. Thanks a lot DrClaude.
 
Last edited:
zeralda21 said:
In order for the angle to be 45 degrees, the ball B must hit A immediately and thus requiring that v_0→∞. Is this analysis correct?

You're forgetting gravity.
 
No need for so much analysis! Consider the relative motion of B with respect to A(consider A to be at rest). The relative acceleration is zero(as both are under influence of gravity). This implies that the path of B as seen by a will be a straight line also it will have constant velocity. The collision is therefore only possible if the velocity vector of B passes through initial position of A giving angle of 45 degrees directly!
 
consciousness said:
No need for so much analysis! Consider the relative motion of B with respect to A(consider A to be at rest). The relative acceleration is zero(as both are under influence of gravity). This implies that the path of B as seen by a will be a straight line also it will have constant velocity. The collision is therefore only possible if the velocity vector of B passes through initial position of A giving angle of 45 degrees directly!

Nice! I like this approach better.
 
zeralda21 said:
Nice! I like this approach better.

This is one of the examples where relative velocity is insanely advantageous.
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K