Collisions in classical mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of collisions and friction in classical mechanics, emphasizing that while gravity is the primary force considered, collisions and friction are fundamentally electrical phenomena. Conservation of momentum is highlighted as a key principle for analyzing collisions, which are based on Newton's laws, particularly the third law. The inclusion of these forces complicates the application of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics due to discontinuous potentials. Ultimately, the consensus is that while collisions and friction are rooted in electromagnetic forces, they can be effectively treated within classical mechanics at low speeds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with conservation of momentum principles
  • Basic knowledge of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Awareness of electromagnetic theory and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Newton's third law in collision scenarios
  • Explore the relationship between classical mechanics and electromagnetic theory
  • Investigate Lagrangian mechanics in the context of discontinuous potentials
  • Learn about the effects of velocity on friction in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in the foundational principles of classical mechanics, particularly those focusing on the complexities introduced by collisions and friction.

stroustroup
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The only force really considered in classical mechanics is gravity. And yet, we often have problems involving collisions and friction, which are intrinsically electrical phenomena, and thus outside the scope of classical mechanics. We have laws such as conservation of momentum which is used for collision problems, but in the end this is all based on the assumption that collisions obey Newton's laws (the 3rd in particular). Also, including collisions and friction basically means accepting the electrical force, and thus Maxwell's equations, which have been shown to contradict classical mechanics (galilean invariance vs lorentz invariance).

Including friction and collisons also causes the systems to be hard to describe using Lagrangian or Hamiltonian approaches (discontinuous potentials), which is another argument that they might be "out of place" in mechanics.

And yet, any course on mechanics has a section on collision problems and friction force. Can we really consider them as classical mechanics phenomena? How would the forces causing collisons be described in a consistent way with Newton's laws?

Would mechanics be consistent if we assumed collisions did not exist (i.e. objects pass through each other) and there was no friction? Even rigid bodies would not exist then...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're reading too much into things... Classical Mechanics studies forces acting on everyday objects at slow speeds. Under these circumstances friction can be treated as a force that is velocity dependent and that's all you need to have theory match experiment.

Of course in a more advanced treatment can bring in EM theory but that now becomes an EM problem.
 
You are right that the friction and collisions are (deep down) due to the EM force. The same holds for pressure and viscosity in fluids. But we care for the lorentz invariance only when the speeds are big enough and comparable to the speed of light. For low speeds there is nothing wrong to encompass these forces into the regime of classical mechanics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K