Magnetic vector and scalar potential

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of magnetic vector and scalar potentials in electromagnetism, particularly focusing on their definitions, implications, and the participants' understanding of these concepts. The scope includes theoretical aspects and conceptual clarifications related to magnetic fields and potentials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the definitions and implications of magnetic scalar and vector potentials, particularly in relation to the magnetic field intensity H and magnetic flux density B.
  • Another participant suggests that scalar magnetic potentials are merely convenient terms for calculations and questions their physical existence, asserting that only the vector magnetic potential A is real.
  • A participant seeks a layman's explanation of how the vector magnetic potential is defined, beyond the mathematical relationship that relates it to magnetic flux density.
  • Another participant references Helmholtz's Theorem to explain that the divergence of B being zero implies that B can be expressed as the curl of a vector field, which they relate to the definition of vector magnetic potential A.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and utility of scalar magnetic potentials, with some questioning their reality while others accept them as part of the theoretical framework. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conceptual clarity of these potentials.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the understanding of the relationship between current density and the existence of magnetic fields, as well as the implications of scalar and vector potentials that remain unaddressed.

reddvoid
Messages
118
Reaction score
1
I understood that
curl H = J
H being magnetic field intensity and magnetic flux density B = u H (u being permeability of free space)
divergence of B is zero because isolated magnetic charge or pole doesn't exist.
but then they define magnetic scalar and vector potentials .i can imagine H and B like in terms of field lines but this scalar and vector potentials making me very uncomfortable.
They say H= - del Vm
(negative divergence of scalar potential) and this is valid only when current density J=0. What i undertood is, first of all static magnetic field is produced by constant current if current density is zero which is del I / del S then current is zero then how can magnetic field exist at first place.
And then they define magnetic vector potential (A) exist just because del . B =0(div of B =0) so B can be expressed as curl of some function since divergence of curl of a vector is zero . I understand this in terms of vector identities but m not able to imagine this magnetic vector potential.
Some body please explain this. Any link to a simulation or java applet will be very helpfull . . .
Thank u.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My understanding is those scalar magnetic potential are fake terms that is used only to make it more convenient in certain calculation. They are trying to make it similar the scalar electric potential of \vec E=-\nabla V. It is not really existing. You only have vector magnetic potential A and \vec B =\nabla \times \vec A.

I never really study the scalar magnetic potential as it is not real.
 
ok. So how can vector magnitude potential be defined like in layman terms other than telling that curl of magnetic vector potential gives magnetic flux density.
 
I study EM but I am not an expert, but I don't think they ever explain in layman's term. It is more like because \nabla \cdot \vec B \equiv 0\;\; \Rightarrow \;\vec B \;\hbox { is solenoidal} \;\Rightarrow \vec B = \nabla \times \;\hbox { (a vector field).} This is the Helmholtz's Theorem. Google this and you'll have a better understanding of the irrotational and solenoidal. And they defined the vector field as "vector magnetic potential" A.

As I said, I am not an instructor nor expert, double check what I said. It should be easy to verify. Just look at your textbook and you should find it. This is basic static magnetics.
 
Last edited:
thanks a lot. . .Ill do that
:-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
12K