MHB Combination of Linear Transformations

TheFallen018
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to get my head around linear transformations, and there are a few things I'm not grasping too well. I'm trying to understand combinations of linear transformations, but I can't find a lot of clear information on them. As far as I can tell, any two linear transformations of the same dimensions should be able to be combined into a single transformation. Is there a clear and easy way to prove this though?

Here's an example of what I mean.

Let F and G be $\mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{m}$ transformations. Define a function $H :$ $\mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{m}$ by $H(u) = 2F(u)-G(u)$. Show that $H$ is also a linear transformation.

I was thinking of trying to show it using standard matrices of linear transformations, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach.

If you could point me in the right direction, that would be really helpful. Thanks heaps! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheFallen018 said:
Hello,

I'm trying to get my head around linear transformations, and there are a few things I'm not grasping too well. I'm trying to understand combinations of linear transformations, but I can't find a lot of clear information on them. As far as I can tell, any two linear transformations of the same dimensions should be able to be combined into a single transformation. Is there a clear and easy way to prove this though?

Here's an example of what I mean.

Let F and G be $\mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{m}$ transformations. Define a function $H :$ $\mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{m}$ by $H(u) = 2F(u)-G(u)$. Show that $H$ is also a linear transformation.

I was thinking of trying to show it using standard matrices of linear transformations, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach.

If you could point me in the right direction, that would be really helpful. Thanks heaps! :)
The definition of a linear transformation is that it is a transformation that preserves addition and scalar multiplication.

So if $F : \mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{m}$ is a linear transformation, that means that $F(u+v) = F(u) + F(v)$ and $F(\lambda u) = \lambda F(u)$ (for all $u,v\in\Bbb{R^n}$ and $\lambda\in\Bbb{R}$).

You have to check that if $F$ and $G$ have those properties then so does $H$.
 
TheFallen018 said:
Hello,

I'm trying to get my head around linear transformations, and there are a few things I'm not grasping too well. I'm trying to understand combinations of linear transformations, but I can't find a lot of clear information on them. As far as I can tell, any two linear transformations of the same dimensions should be able to be combined into a single transformation. Is there a clear and easy way to prove this though?

Here's an example of what I mean.

Let F and G be $\mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{m}$ transformations.
? Doesn't the problem say that F and G are linear transformations? If not then this is simply not true!

Define a function $H :$ $\mathbb{R}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{m}$ by $H(u) = 2F(u)-G(u)$. Show that $H$ is also a linear transformation.

I was thinking of trying to show it using standard matrices of linear transformations, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach.

If you could point me in the right direction, that would be really helpful. Thanks heaps! :)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K