Combinatorics Cameron - Lucas' Theorem Proof

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
RiceRiceRice
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Combinatorics Cameron -- Lucas' Theorem Proof

Hi everybody --

Im currently going through Peter Cameron's combinatorics book, and I'm having trouble understanding a step in the proof of Lucas' Theorem, given on page 28 for those of you with the book.

The theorem states for p prime,

m = a0 + a1p + . . . + akpk
n = b0 + b1p + . . . + bkpk

where 0 ≤ ai, bi < p for i = 0, . . ., k -1. Then:

(m choose n ) ≡ [itex]\prod[/itex] (ai choose bi ) (mod p), where the product is taken from i = 0 to i = k.

The proof then states:

It suffices to show that, if m = cp + a and n = dp + b, where 0 ≤ a, b < p, then

(m choose n ) [itex]\equiv[/itex] (c choose d) * (a choose b) (mod p) FOR

a = a0
b = b0
c = a1 + . . . + akpk-1
d = b1 + . . . + bkpk-1

I understand the proof of this statement, but I don't know why proving this is sufficient to proving the original theorem.

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It is the step of induction. Once it is proven, the theorem becomes a corollary.