Combining Functions: Explaining Multiplication of F(X) & H(X)

  • Thread starter Thread starter CanadianEh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying the combined function of F(X) = X and H(X) = COS X as their multiplication, F(X) * H(X). Key features of the graph, such as oscillation and the absence of asymptotes, support this choice. The oscillation indicates the influence of the cosine function, while the increasing magnitude of oscillation for positive and negative x-values aligns with multiplication. Comparisons with addition and subtraction highlight how their graphs would differ, emphasizing the unique characteristics of the product function. Overall, understanding these features helps justify the selection of multiplication for the combined function.
CanadianEh
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was giving a graph of a combined function and four different equations and I need to select 2 of the equations and whether the graph shown is of addition, subtraction, multiplication or division. F(X)= X and H(X) = COS X and the combined graph is F(X)*H(X).

I need to justify my answer using key features of the graph as related to the initial functions

My attempt:

I could easily tell in my head that the graph shown on my paper was of X*cosX, but I'm just not sure how to explain it using the key features (domain, range, x and y ints, etc.). Essentially, I have to explain why I chose those two functions and why I chose multiplication.

- The new function is oscillating, which is why cos X is one of the functions.
- There are no asymptotes

What else can I say? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are some ideas. You didn't say what the other two functions are, which makes it difficult to say why you chose f(x) = x and h(x) = cos x as the two you chose. As far as the arithmetic operation, think about how the graphs of f + h, f - h, fh, and f/h would look, based on the two functions you showed, and the other two that you didn't show.

For f + h you would have a graph that has the same oscillation as cos x, but with a central axis (for lack of a better word) that angles up to the right.

For f - h, which is equal to f + (-h), the graph would be similar to that of f + h, except that instead of adding cos x you would be adding its reflection across the x-axis.

For fh, when x > 0, you are multiplying by increasingly larger values, so you get the oscillation of the cosine factor, but the magnitude of the oscillation increases. When x < 0, this time you are multiplying by numbers that are getting more negative, which has a similar effect on the magnitude of oscillation, but also flips the cosine graph across the x-axis.

For f/h, because you are dividing by something that is periodically zero, there are going to be vertical asymptotes at each odd multiple of pi/2 (i.e., at +/-pi/2, +/-3pi/2, +/-5pi/2, and so on). At all other points you are going to be dividing by numbers in the interval [-1, 1], so there will be points on the graph that are identical to those on the graph of f(x) = x, and some that are identical to those on the graph of y = -x.

That should give you something to think about.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K