Combining Physics & Medicine: My Questions & Advice Needed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the participant's dilemma of choosing between a career in medicine, particularly neurosurgery, and pursuing a passion for physics, specifically in nanoscience and quantum research. The conversation explores the intersection of physics and medicine, as well as the implications of career choices and parental expectations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • The participant expresses interest in both medicine and physics, seeking advice on how to align these fields.
  • Some participants suggest that the participant should study what they are passionate about, emphasizing that personal fit is crucial.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the financial aspects of research careers compared to medical professions, with some participants noting that parents prioritize salary.
  • One participant recommends gaining real-world experience with patients to inform the decision-making process regarding a medical career.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of patient interaction for someone interested in research rather than clinical practice.
  • Discussion includes the importance of bedside manner in medicine and how it can affect patient outcomes.
  • There is mention of a book that discusses patient care and the importance of connection in medical practice.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the importance of personal interest versus parental expectations, as well as the necessity of patient interaction for a career in medicine. No consensus is reached on the best path forward for the participant.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying perspectives on the relationship between medicine and physics, the role of financial considerations in career choices, and the value of hands-on experience in making informed decisions about medical careers.

  • #31
radium said:
I know an MD PhD who did his PhD in physics so it's definitely possible.

How long did it take him and how old was? The same as a regular physics PhD?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I don't know how old he was but the physics PhD took four years but as a theorist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta31415
  • #33
radium said:
I don't know how old he was but the physics PhD took four years but as a theorist.
Fours years for a PhD... Don't tell me it was in it the states...
 
  • #34
Yes it was in the US. Sometimes the PhD portion of an MD/PhD can be shorter than the average PhD. I do know other people in physics who got their PhD in four years but it's become pretty rare. The average is getting around 6 now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K