The discussion explores the relationship between physics and combustion, questioning how physical principles can explain the burning or melting of various materials, particularly metals. Participants seek to clarify the role of physics in understanding combustion processes and the unique reactions that may arise from these principles.
Participants express differing views on the extent to which physics can independently explain combustion, with some asserting that chemistry is also essential. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific physics principles applicable to combustion.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions or boundaries between physics and chemistry in the context of combustion, and there are unresolved questions about the specific physics principles involved.
iwannalearn1 said:How does physics play into combustion? Can it be used to explain why certain metals/materials burn or melt? I don't understand how combustion can be explained in terms of physics instead of chemistry. Also, what are some things that can be burned that result in a unique reaction due to physics principles? Any clarifications to any or all of those questions would be much appreciated, thanks!
iwannalearn1 said:So I could use electron jumps to explain why lithium burns red when ignited? Is that physics?
iwannalearn1 said:I'm trying to look for a specific physics principle that plays a part in combustion, but I understand what you're saying. Thanks for the help.
iwannalearn1 said:I'm not necessarily looking for a specific physics principle to explain why lithium burns red, just to explain the combustion process in general.
iwannalearn1 said:During the combustion process, energy is given off and electrons jump to different levels. When they jump, they emit light particles called photons. Depending on the metals, different colors are released.