Comet Speed Around Sun: Solving with Energy & Momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter henry3369
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet Sun
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a comet at different distances from the sun using conservation of energy and angular momentum principles. The initial speed of the comet is 1.5×104 m/s at a distance of 2.1×1011 m, and the calculated speed at a distance of 5.1×1010 m using energy conservation is 6.5×104 m/s. In contrast, the angular momentum approach yields a speed of 6.18×104 m/s, highlighting the importance of correctly interpreting the angles involved in the calculations. The conclusion emphasizes that energy conservation is the most reliable method for solving this problem due to the complexities introduced by angular momentum in elliptical orbits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy in physics
  • Familiarity with angular momentum and its applications
  • Knowledge of elliptical orbits and Kepler's laws
  • Basic calculus for differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of energy in orbital mechanics
  • Learn about angular momentum in non-circular orbits
  • Explore Kepler's laws and their implications for cometary motion
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of elliptical orbits
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on celestial mechanics, as well as anyone interested in the dynamics of cometary orbits and the application of conservation laws in physics.

henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Comets travel around the sun in elliptical orbits with large eccentricities. If a comet has speed 1.5×104m/s when at a distance of 2.1×1011m from the center of the sun, what is its speed when at a distance of 5.1×1010

Homework Equations


Conservation of energy

The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to solve this using conservation of energy, but I was wondering why I don't the get same answer from conservation of angular momentum. There is no external force because the only force is the force of gravity, which is part of the system.

Here is the attempt with conservation of angular momentum:
m(r x v) = m(rfinal x vfinal)
(r x v) = (rfinal x vfinal)
The velocities are tangential so sin(90) = 1
(r)(v) = (rfinal) (vfinal)
(1.5x104)(2.1x1011) = (5.1x1010)(vfinal)
(vfinal) = 6.18 x 104 m/s

The correct answer, obtained using conservation of energy is (vfinal) = 6.5 x 104 m/s

The answers should be the same though. There is no external force or non-conservative forces.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even earlier in my assignment, it mentions that the angular momentum is conserved about the center if the distance between them is changed.
 
You've assumed that the velocity vectors for the two given distances are perpendicular to the radius vectors, i.e., you've assumed perihelion and aphelion for the given points. But this is NOT specified in the problem statement! You cannot take the angle in the cross product to be 90°.
 
Kepler's 2nd law (constant rate of area being swept out, or 1/2 ωr2), is equivalent to the conservation of momentum, which is mωr2. The key is a central force but not a velocity perpendicular to that force.

ω is continually changing and = dθ/dt where dθ is the differential angle formed by the comet's radius vector at two differentially short times dt apart. In other words, at any instant, ω = v/r.

So, differentially, v IS perpendicular to r. Your answer of 6.18e4 is correct. Your answer based on energy conservation had to use the mass of the sun which is not necessarily the mass of the sun as the problem implies!

EDIT: after looking at this some more I've concluded that there is no way to solve this problem other than by energy conservation. The reason is that
v2 = (r2)(dθ/dt)2 + (dr/dt)2 ... (1)
& I left out the second term in computing v2. Unfortunately I see no way to determine the second term above with the given data. The solution would not be unique.

Unless points 1 and 2 correspond to the following points on the elliptical orbit:
(a) aphelion and one of the two points where the semi-minor axis intersects the orbit;
(b) perihelion & one of the above-mentioned two points; or
(c) aphelion and perihelion.
In all three cases the second term in my equation (1) vanishes and your answer would be correct.

Sorry for the confusion.
 
Last edited:
v is perpendicular to r only for circular orbits or at aphelion and perihelion for elliptical orbits. This is why angular momentum involves a cross product rather than it being a simple scalar product of |r| and |v|.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
993
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K