Commutativity of differentiation in a special case

  • Thread starter Thread starter HotMintea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
HotMintea
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Problem

I'd like to prove [itex]\frac{d}{dt}[\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}f(x(t),y(t),t)]=\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}[\frac{d}{dt}f(x(t),y(t),t)][/itex].

Attempt
[tex]\begin{equation*}\begin{split}<br /> \frac{d}{dt}[\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f(x(t),y(t),t)]=\frac{d}{dt}\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\frac{f(x(t)+\epsilon,y(t),t)-f(x(t),y(t),t)}{\epsilon}\\<br /> =\lim_{\delta\to 0}\lim_{\epsilon\to 0} \frac{[f(x(t+\delta)+\epsilon,y(t+\delta),t+\delta)-f(x(t)+\epsilon,y(t),t)]-[f(x(t+\delta),y(t+\delta),t+\delta)-f(x(t),y(t),t)]}{\epsilon\delta}\end{split}\end{equation*}[/tex]

So if my previous steps are correct, I need to show that the 2 limits are commutative, which I have no idea...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you know you can express the total derivative as a sum of partial derivatives?
 
Are you required to go all the way back to the definition of derivative? If not, use the chain rule as hunt mat suggests.
 
Thanks for the hints!

[itex]\frac{d}{dt}\partial_{x}f(x(t), y(t), t)=(\sum\dot{x}_k \partial_{x_k}+\partial_t)\partial_{x}f=\sum\dot x_k\partial_{x_k}\partial_{x}f+\partial_t\partial_{x}f[/itex].

At this point, I need to show the "equality of mixed partials". I found the proof of [itex]f_{xy}=f_{yx}[/itex] for [itex]f(x, y)[/itex] here: http://www.sju.edu/~pklingsb/clairaut.pdf

My function is f(x(t), y(t), t) so a bit different.

For proving [itex]f_{x(t)\hspace{1mm}t} = f_{t\hspace{1 mm}x(t)}[/itex] for f(x(t), t), I think the proof in the note works if I substitute c=x(a) and d=x(b).

I also think the theorem can be extended to [itex]f(x_1(t), x_2(t), ..., x_n(t), t)[/itex] if I imagine slicing the n dimensional space by a plane parallel to [itex]x_i x_j[/itex] plane (or [itex]x_i\hspace{1 mm}t[/itex] plane).

So I have [itex]f_{x_i x_j}=f_{x_j x_i}[/itex] and [itex]f_{x_i\hspace{1 mm}t}=f_{t\hspace{1 mm}x_i}[/itex] for [itex]f(x_1(t), ..., x_n(t), t)[/itex]. Is that okay?

By the way, I don't understand why the author of the note wrote [itex]f_{xy}(x,y)-f_{yx}(x,y)\ge \frac{h}{2}[/itex]. Is that arbitrary? Can I use h/3 instead for example?