Commutator of complex Klein-Gordon solution with total momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the commutation relation between the total momentum operator \( P^{\mu} \) and the scalar field operator \( \phi(x) \) in the context of quantum field theory. The specific relation to prove is \([P^{\mu}, \phi(x)] = -i \partial^{\mu} \phi(x)\). The operators involved include \( a(\vec{k}) \) and \( b^{\dagger}(\vec{k}) \), with the momentum operator defined as \( P^{\mu} = \int \frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}2\omega(\vec{k})} k^{\mu} [\mathcal{N}_{a}(\vec{k}) + \mathcal{N}_{b}(\vec{k})] \). The discussion emphasizes the need to correctly handle the integrals and the commutation relations of the creation and annihilation operators.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with scalar field operators and their representations
  • Knowledge of commutation relations for creation and annihilation operators
  • Proficiency in performing integrals in the context of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the commutation relations for \( a^{\dagger} \) and \( a \) operators
  • Study the properties of integrals involving multiple variables in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of the Klein-Gordon equation in quantum field theory
  • Explore different conventions for commutation relations in quantum field textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum field theory, particularly those working on the mathematical foundations of particle physics and the behavior of scalar fields.

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hey guys,

So I have to show the following:

[P^{\mu} , \phi(x)]=-i\partial^{\mu}\phi(x),

where

\phi(x)=\int \frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}2\omega(\vec{k})} \left[ a(\vec{k})e^{-ik\cdot x}+b^{\dagger}(\vec{k})e^{ik\cdot x} \right]

and

P^{\mu}=\int \frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}2\omega(\vec{k})} k^{\mu} \left[ \mathcal{N}_{a}(\vec{k})+\mathcal{N}_{b}(\vec{k}) \right]

Homework Equations



\mathcal{N}_{a}=a^{\dagger}(\vec{k})a(\vec{k})
\mathcal{N}_{b}=b^{\dagger}(\vec{k})b(\vec{k})

The Attempt at a Solution



So all I've done is calculated the commutator as normal and collected all the terms, and I've got:

JGYzoM.png

The only difference is that I've dropped the functional dependence on k to make it shorter.

I'm stuck at this point - not quite sure how to proceed! please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. Since P^\mu and \phi(x) both involve integrals, the product should be a double integral. And you need to distinguish between the integration for P^\mu and the integration for \phi(x). So use k for the first integral and k' for the second.

You need the commutation relation on the operators a^\dagger, a, b^\dagger, b. There are different conventions, so you have to look up which one your textbook is using, but it's something like this:

[ a^\dagger(k), a(k') ] = -(2 \pi)^3 2E \delta^3(k - k')

where E = k^0
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K