High School Commutators of functions of operators

Click For Summary
If operators A and B commute, then the operators e^A and e^B also commute. This can be shown using mathematical induction on the MacLaurin series expansions of the operators. The commutation follows from the property that A^m B^n = B^n A^m when [A, B] = 0. The discussion also addresses the impracticality of having matrices with infinite elements, as this concept does not hold in standard matrix theory. Overall, the relationship between the commutation of operators and their exponential forms is affirmed.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
I would like to ask whether if operators ##A## and ##B## commute also operators ##e^A## and ##e^B## commute? Also I have a question is it possible that
##e^A## is matrix where all elements are ##\infty## so that ##e^A \cdot e^B-e^B\cdot e^A## has all elements that are ##\infty##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:
I would like to ask whether if operators ##A## and ##B## commute also operators ##e^A## and ##e^B## commute?
Have you tried to prove that?

LagrangeEuler said:
Also I have a question is it possible that
##e^A## is matrix where all elements are ##\infty## so that ##e^A \cdot e^B-e^B\cdot e^A## has all elements that are ##\infty##?
That makes no sense. Matrices cannot have infinite elements.
 
LagrangeEuler said:
I would like to ask whether if operators ##A## and ##B## commute also operators ##e^A## and ##e^B## commute?
I would try to prove that by showing with mathematical induction that any partial sum MacLaurin expansions ##\displaystyle\sum\limits_{k=0}^{N}\frac{1}{k!}A^k## and ##\displaystyle\sum\limits_{k=0}^{N}\frac{1}{k!}B^k## with a finite ##N## commute when ##[A,B]=0##. It results just from the fact that ##A^m B^n = B^n A^m## for any ##m,n\in\mathbb{N}## when ##[A,B]=0##, so the order of operators doesn't make any difference when forming that polynomial of two operator variables.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
835
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
859
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K