Compact Metric Spaces: Subcover of Balls with Limited Number

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mathmos6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact Metric
Click For Summary
In compact metric spaces, the statement regarding the existence of a constant N for every subcover of balls of radius one is under scrutiny. The concept of compactness implies that every open cover has a finite subcover, but the challenge lies in determining if a uniform bound on the number of balls exists. A suggestion is made to consider a closed disk of radius 2 to explore potential counterexamples. The discussion emphasizes the importance of constructing examples that illustrate whether the statement holds true or not. Engaging with these concepts is crucial for a deeper understanding of compact metric spaces.
Mathmos6
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is the following statement true: for every compact metric space X there is a constant N S.T. every subcover of X by balls of radius one has a subcover with at most N balls?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I know you're meant to post your working but I really can't get started on this one! I can't even work out which way I should be proving, I have no clue whether this is true or false :( I have a feeling it's true but that's really got no actual mathematical basis sadly. I know the definitions of compactness - each open cover must have a finite subcover - and of balls, metric space etc, but I'm not sure how to apply it or how to approach the problem. Could someone please please get me started? Many many thanks,

Mathmos6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe your feeling it's true is holding you back from trying to construct a counterexample. Think about a closed disk of radius 2. What you want to do is construct a series of open covers with the number of open sets needed to cover going to infinity.
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
16K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K