Does the Compact Set K+K Have Nonempty Interior?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the set K+K, where K is a compact set of positive Lebesgue measure, has a nonempty interior. The proof utilizes the convolution of the characteristic function of K, resulting in a nonnegative continuous function f whose integral is m(K)^2, which is greater than zero. This implies that f is positive on some open interval, thus confirming that K+K contains an open interval. The continuity of the convolution is established using properties from harmonic analysis, specifically referencing Rudin's "Fourier Analysis on Groups."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lebesgue measure and its properties
  • Familiarity with convolution of functions in L^1 and L^\infty spaces
  • Knowledge of compact sets and their topological properties
  • Basic concepts of harmonic analysis, particularly theorems related to continuity of convolutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lebesgue measure in relation to compact sets
  • Learn about convolution in L^p spaces and its implications for continuity
  • Explore Fubini's theorem and its applications in measure theory
  • Read Rudin's "Fourier Analysis on Groups" for deeper insights into harmonic analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in measure theory, harmonic analysis, and topology, will benefit from this discussion. It is also relevant for students seeking to understand the relationship between Lebesgue measure and the properties of compact sets.

Nedeljko
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Let K\subseteq\mathbb R is a compact set of positive Lebesque measure. Prove that the set K+K=\{a+b\,|\,a,b\in K\} has nonempty interior.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far? Do you know of any links between the Lebesgue measure and the topology of R?
 
All open and all closed sets are measurable. For any measurable set E and positive real \varepsilon there are an closed set F\subseteq E and an open set G\supseteq E such that measure of G\setminus F is less than \varepsilon.
 
The original problem is formulated for any measurable set E. Using the fact that any measurable set of positive measure has a compact subset of positive measure, the general case is reduced to special case of compact sets.
 
I thought I had an elementary solution, but I discovered some holes in my reasoning. Anyway, a quick and dirty way to solve the problem is to convolve the characteristic function of K with itself. You will get a nonnegative continuous function f whose integral is m(K)^2 > 0. Thus f must be positive on some open interval - but f is positive precisely on K+K.
 
Last edited:
Are you sure that convolution is continuous? Why? Do you have a link? You state that the convolution is positive exactly on K+K, but K+K is compact and continuous function is positive on the open set.
 
It's a theorem that if f \in L^1(\mathbb{R}) and g \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R}) then f*g is continuous. (In fact, the same conclusion holds for f \in L^p(\mathbb{R}) and g \in L^q(\mathbb{R}), where p and q are convex conjugates.) You can find this in almost any text on harmonic analysis, e.g. it's on page 4 of Rudin's Fourier Analysis on Groups.

The point of my post was the following: Since f is positive precisely on K+K (this statement actually requires a line of proof) and since f is positive on an open interval, then K+K must contain an open interval.
 
that's very neat.
One thing though, f is positive on a subset of K+K (rather than precisely on K+K), which is exactly what was needed - and the condition that K is compact wasn't needed, only finite measure.

...and to show that convolution f*g is continuous is easy when g is continuous. The general case follows by taking limits.
 
Last edited:
I proved thjat f is continuous an that the open set U=\{x\in\mathbb{R}\,:\,f(x)>0\} is the subset of K+K. But, how to prove that the set U is nonempty? In fact, f(x)=m(K\cap(x-K)).
 
  • #10
Note that if {f>0} was empty then the integral of f would be zero. Can you say what the integral of f is?
 
  • #11
OK, application of Fubini's theorem gives \int_{\mathbb{R}}f\,dm=m(K)^2>0. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K