Comparing Deck Beams: 4"x10" vs. 4"x12" with Same Material and Load Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter walt88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing the strength and stiffness of two different beam sizes (4"x10" and 4"x12") under the same material and load conditions for a deck application. Participants explore concepts related to beam deflection, moment of inertia, section modulus, and how these factors influence the performance of beams in structural applications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Post 1 presents the dimensions and lengths of two beams and calculates their moment of inertia, suggesting that beam A has less deflection than beam B under the same load, questioning if this implies beam A is stronger.
  • Post 2 introduces the concept of section modulus as a method for comparing beam strength, explaining how it can be calculated and its relevance to maximum moment and allowable stress.
  • Post 3 asserts that beam A is stiffer and stronger than beam B based on calculated values, providing specific ratios for stiffness and strength.
  • Post 4 cautions against conflating member strength and stiffness with performance under load, indicating that the longer beam may experience higher stress and deflection despite being larger.
  • Post 5 supports the idea that the shorter beam is stronger under the same load, providing a percentage increase in stress for the longer beam and emphasizing the complexity of comparing beam strengths with varying lengths.
  • Post 6 reiterates that comparing beam strengths requires consideration of both section modulus and the length of the beams in relation to the applied moment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of beam dimensions on strength and performance. While some argue that beam A is stronger based on deflection and stiffness, others highlight that the longer beam's increased length may lead to higher stress and deflection, indicating a lack of consensus on the overall strength comparison.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the importance of considering both the section modulus and the length of the beams when evaluating their performance under load, suggesting that the relationship between these factors is complex and not straightforward.

walt88
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is for a deck:

Which beam is stronger?

A) a beam with cross-section dimensions 4"x10" and 8' long
B) a beam with cross-section dimensions 4"x12" and 12' long

Both beams are same material and are both simply supported at the ends. Same load type (either concentrated or distributed doesn't really matter) and same load location.


Here are my thoughts:
Moment of inertia for beams: A: 333.33 in^4; B: 576 in^4
Lengths of beams: A: 96 in; B: 144 in

Using the equation for a concentrated load at the center: P = (deflection*48*E*I)/(L^3)
The deflection of beam A is about half the deflection of B. Does this mean A is stronger with the given loads?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A good way to compare is to use what is known as the section modulus (usually given the symbol Z or S)

Values of Z are often tabulated in structural tables, but can easily be computed as the ratio of the moment of intertia to the distance from the neutral axis to the edge of the beam (c).


Z = \frac{I}{c}

In the case of a rectangular beam c=h/2 where h is the height of the beam.

If M is the maximum moment on the beam ( computed directly from the loads and geometry of the beam) and f is the allowable maximum stress in the material, a particularly simple equation then results.


Z = \frac{M}{f}

does this help?
 
walt88 said:
Does this mean beam A is stronger with the given loads?
walt88: Yes, that is correct. If both beams have exactly the same material strength, beam A is 1.953 times stiffer than beam B with respect to (w.r.t.) deflection, and 1.042 times stronger than beam B w.r.t. stress.
 
Don't confuse member strength and stiffness with performance under load. The larger section is both stronger and stiffer, but because it is on a longer span, it may be more highly stressed and may deflect more under the same load.
 
It's true, with some quick calcs it looks like the stress under the same load will be 4.2% higher in the longer beam. In other words, the shorter beam is stronger under the same load.

It takes more than just the section modulus to compare beam strengths when the length changes too...
 

Attachments

It takes more than just the section modulus to compare beam strengths when the length changes too

Yes indeed, but this is taken care of in the comparison to the section modulus to the actual applied moment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
35K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
11K
Replies
48
Views
19K
Replies
20
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K