Comparing General Relativity books

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison between two General Relativity (GR) textbooks: "Gravitation" by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler (MTW) and "A First Course in General Relativity" by Bernard Schutz. The participant expresses a preference for Schutz due to time constraints and seeks to understand the depth of knowledge they may miss by not studying MTW. It is concluded that while Schutz provides a comprehensive introduction, MTW covers a broader range of topics and examples, which may be beneficial for a deeper understanding of GR. Additionally, Sean Carroll's text is recommended as a modern alternative that balances depth and accessibility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of Calculus I and II
  • Familiarity with Linear Algebra concepts
  • Knowledge of fundamental physics principles
  • Awareness of General Relativity concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "A First Course in General Relativity" by Bernard Schutz
  • Explore "Gravitation" by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler for advanced topics
  • Study Sean Carroll's lecture notes on General Relativity available online
  • Investigate supplementary resources on GR concepts, such as online courses or video lectures
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of physics, particularly those interested in General Relativity, as well as educators seeking to recommend accessible yet comprehensive resources for learning GR.

Elnur Hajiyev
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hello. I have 2 books in General Relativity: MTW Gravitation and Bernard Schutz First Course in General Relativity. I studied Calculus I, II, and have a basic understanding of Linear Algebra(did not studied extensively). I want to learn about GR as much as possible, and improve myself to become at least semi-professional on the topic, on the other hand I do not have enough time to read a big book such as MTW right know read Schutz. Just want to know what will I miss if I learn GR from Schutz instead of MTW Track-1 and is it sufficient to be good in GR as a graduate student?

P.S. MTW Track-1 topics is outlined gray in the book.
P.P.S. I am willing to spend time to learn GR, but I am not Physics student to spend all my time to solely Physics, so I would not prefer to spend much time to learn the same thing just with more examples and explanations, while I can spend less time to read and much time to think about the topics I read and figure out what is going on in my head. So I would know if the differences between the books are really such kind of.
I am sorry, if my language is as bad as not to be understood, but hope my question is clear. I appreciate your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amazon let's me see the table of contents of Schutz, and it looks like a pretty complete introduction. The size of MTW is absurd; it contains a huge amount of material that you don't need in order to achieve your goal. BTW, Carroll is a good modern alternative to the standard graduate texts such as MTW and Wald, and there is a partial version online that is free: http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/Carroll_contents.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, Elnur Hajiyev and QuantumQuest
bcrowell said:
Amazon let's me see the table of contents of Schutz, and it looks like a pretty complete introduction. The size of MTW is absurd; it contains a huge amount of material that you don't need in order to achieve your goal. BTW, Carroll is a good modern alternative to the standard graduate texts such as MTW and Wald, and there is a partial version online that is free: http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll3/Carroll_contents.html
Yes, contents cover all concepts that need to learn GR. But I am not sure how much will I learn at the end of the book and what will I miss if I don't read, for example, from Carroll?

Thanks, in advance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K