Comparing Light & X-Rays: Wavelengths

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between visible light and X-rays, specifically focusing on their wavelengths as a distinguishing factor. Participants are exploring the characteristics of electromagnetic radiation in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to articulate the differences in wavelengths between visible light and X-rays. Questions arise regarding the meaning of "short" and "long" without quantification, and the necessity of making explicit comparisons.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on improving the clarity of the original poster's response by suggesting more precise language and the inclusion of quantitative comparisons. There is an ongoing exploration of how to effectively communicate the differences in wavelength.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be an emphasis on the need for quantification in scientific explanations, as well as a recognition that vague terminology may lead to confusion. The discussion reflects a common challenge in articulating scientific concepts clearly.

zachcumer
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Hey here is the question I have to answer...

What is the principal difference between light and an X-ray?

I thought that X rays have short wavelengths, and light has long?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hello?
 
anyone? hello? anyone there?
 
Yes, visible light and X-rays are BOTH electromagnetic radiation. The only thing that distinguishes them is their wavelength. It's true that the wavelength of X-rays is shorter than that of visible light, but the words "short' and "long" in your answer are pretty meaningless unless you actually quantify the wavelength.
 
so what I was going to put down was the principal differences are that visible light has longer wavelengths compared to x rays which have shorter wavelengths.
 
That's fine, I was just pointing out that if you write it that way, the question naturally arises: shorter than WHAT? Longer than WHAT?

"Shorter" and "longer" imply a comparison

If you write: "The principal difference is the wavelength of the two types of EM radiation. The wavelength of visible light is longer than the wavelength of an X-ray."

EDIT: Or you could just omit the 4 words "which have shorter wavelengths" from the end of your answer.

Either way, that's a better wording because it makes it clear WHAT the comparison is. However, the answer is still vague. If you actually specified how many orders of magnitude longer the wavelength of visible light was, that would be even better:

The wavelength of visible light is 10^{blah} times longer than the wavelength of x-rays.

Even better would be to explicitly state the wavelengths. Physics is a quantitative science.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
976
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K