Comparing Results of MCNP vs Geant4 for Shielding Design

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the results of MCNP and Geant4 for shielding design, with participants noting that Geant4 features a more modern syntax. However, there are claims that MCNP may provide more accurate results. The conversation references a publication that reviews Monte Carlo codes, suggesting it may offer insights into the performance of both tools. Users express curiosity about the practical implications of these differences in results. Ultimately, the choice between MCNP and Geant4 may depend on specific project needs and preferences.
terryphi
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I'm curious if anyone has any opinions in the results from MCNP vs Geant4 for shielding design.

I like that Geant4 uses a more modern syntax, but iv'e also heard that MCNP gives better results.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org


Perhaps this helps?
http://www.irradiationpanel.org/docs/publications/MonteCarloCode%20Review_2010Publication.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom?'

What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?
View full post »

Similar threads

Shielded and unshielded dose from a Co-60 source are the same?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
987
How does MNCP calculate an F6 Tally?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Help with F4 Fm4 dose calculation in MCNP simulation
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Technical Discussion on TMESH Tally in MCNP 6.2 and 6.3
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
MCNP PTRAC card help
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Run MCNP 5 input file of certain geometry for flux calculation
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
MCNP Modelling Detector Energy Response Vs Empirical Results
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
MCNP and simple nuclear physics
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
MCNP Summary Table: Explanation and Use
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
[MCNP] Lost too much Keff with Burnup card
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K