Comparing Two Different Answers for Calculating Nth Order Fourier Approximation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter roam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation Fourier
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12
I once wanted to find the nth order Fourier approximation for [tex]f(x)=x[/tex]. Since this function is odd, the projections on all cosines will be zero, hence it will be expressed through the sines only. So I just needed to find the sine coefficients.

The problem is that I checked the answer to this problem in two different textbooks, each one giving a different answer from the other.

  • The first book calculates the coefficients like this:
[tex]b_k= \frac{1}{\pi} \int^{2 \pi}_{0} f(x)sin(kx)= \frac{1}{\pi} \int^{2 \pi}_0 xsin(kx) dx =- \frac{2}{k}[/tex]

  • The second book calculates the coefficients this way:
[tex]b_k = (f(x),sin (k \pi x))= \int^1_{-1} x sin (k \pi x) dx= -x\frac{cos (k \pi x)}{k \pi} \right]^1_{-1} + \int^1_{-1} \frac{cos (k \pi x)}{k \pi}dx[/tex][tex]= -2 \frac{cos k \pi}{k \pi}=-(-1)^k \frac{2}{k \pi}[/tex]

So which one is correct? I mean, they both are probably correct but I don't understand why each of these books use different methods and end up with different answers. Any explanation is very much appreciated.
 
on Phys.org
Those two expressions are for the series of different functions. One is the periodic extension of f(x) = x on (-1,1) and the other the periodic extension of f(x) = x on (-π,π). One is a sawtooth of period 2π and the other a sawtooth of period 2. They happen to agree on (-1,1).