B Comparing two expenditures of work

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter thetexan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the work done by two individuals traveling the same distance from Central Park to the Golden Gate Bridge, one walking and the other using a skateboard. It highlights the importance of specifying the type of work being measured, such as the force involved and the effects of gravity and air resistance. The conversation notes that while both methods cover the same distance, the physiological energy expenditure differs, with skateboarding generally requiring less energy than walking. Additionally, the complexities of measuring work in physics versus physiology are emphasized. Ultimately, the debate underscores that the efficiency of travel methods can vary significantly based on the context of the question.
thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
Let’s say we have two persons who are going to travel from Central Park in New York to the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. One is going to walk and the other is going to use his skate board. And let’s say they weigh the same and take the exact same route.

the question is this...is the same amount of work done (give or take) in both cases? As I understand work, they are both moving the same mass over the same distance albeit using different methods of expenditure of effort.

Another way to ask the question...which would be the better way of travel (considering energy necessary) walk or skate board?

tex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to be careful when posing questions of this kind. You say, "the question is this...is the same amount of work done (give or take) in both cases?" "Work done" is too vague. You need to specify the force doing the work. For example, if the persons are initially and finally at rest, the work done by the net force will be zero. If you want the work done by gravity, it will be ##W_g=-mg\Delta h## where ##\Delta h## is the vertical displacement of the persons. If you want the work done by air resistance, ##\dots~## it's complicated.
 
There is also a difference between physics and physiology. In physiology, a person uses energy (work) even when standing still.

So if you phrased your question using only machines, not biology, it would be clearer that you are asking about physics.
 
It's not an original question. Did you try searching the web with google or the like?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25085605/
"Self-selected speeds and metabolic cost of longboard skateboarding"
Eur J Appl Physiol, 2014 Nov

"...The gross metabolic cost was ~2.2 J kg(-1) m(-1) at the typical speed, greater than that reported for cycling and ~50% smaller than that of walking."
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top