High School Comparing two expenditures of work

  • Thread starter Thread starter thetexan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the work done by two individuals traveling the same distance from Central Park to the Golden Gate Bridge, one walking and the other using a skateboard. It highlights the importance of specifying the type of work being measured, such as the force involved and the effects of gravity and air resistance. The conversation notes that while both methods cover the same distance, the physiological energy expenditure differs, with skateboarding generally requiring less energy than walking. Additionally, the complexities of measuring work in physics versus physiology are emphasized. Ultimately, the debate underscores that the efficiency of travel methods can vary significantly based on the context of the question.
thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
Let’s say we have two persons who are going to travel from Central Park in New York to the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. One is going to walk and the other is going to use his skate board. And let’s say they weigh the same and take the exact same route.

the question is this...is the same amount of work done (give or take) in both cases? As I understand work, they are both moving the same mass over the same distance albeit using different methods of expenditure of effort.

Another way to ask the question...which would be the better way of travel (considering energy necessary) walk or skate board?

tex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to be careful when posing questions of this kind. You say, "the question is this...is the same amount of work done (give or take) in both cases?" "Work done" is too vague. You need to specify the force doing the work. For example, if the persons are initially and finally at rest, the work done by the net force will be zero. If you want the work done by gravity, it will be ##W_g=-mg\Delta h## where ##\Delta h## is the vertical displacement of the persons. If you want the work done by air resistance, ##\dots~## it's complicated.
 
There is also a difference between physics and physiology. In physiology, a person uses energy (work) even when standing still.

So if you phrased your question using only machines, not biology, it would be clearer that you are asking about physics.
 
It's not an original question. Did you try searching the web with google or the like?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25085605/
"Self-selected speeds and metabolic cost of longboard skateboarding"
Eur J Appl Physiol, 2014 Nov

"...The gross metabolic cost was ~2.2 J kg(-1) m(-1) at the typical speed, greater than that reported for cycling and ~50% smaller than that of walking."
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
755
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
738
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
8K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K