Comparison of students from Great Universities and Normal Universities

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the qualifications of students graduating from prestigious universities compared to those from state universities. Participants explore the implications of university reputation on career success, particularly in fields like science and engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that it is not certain that graduates from top universities like UC Berkeley or Stanford are inherently more qualified than those from state universities.
  • One participant emphasizes that personal motivation and self-discipline can be more significant than the prestige of the institution attended.
  • Another participant shares examples of successful scientists who graduated from lesser-known universities, suggesting that a focus on specific research interests is more important than attending a 'brand-name' school.
  • A participant expresses concern about the difficulty of gaining admission to prestigious graduate programs in mathematics and physics, sharing their personal experience as an international undergraduate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the necessity of attending prestigious universities for success, with multiple competing views on the importance of university reputation versus personal attributes and research alignment.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific successful individuals and their educational backgrounds, indicating that the discussion may depend on personal experiences and anecdotal evidence rather than broader statistical analysis.

Kinn Sein
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
Is it 100% sure that students graduated from great universities like UC Berkeley or Stanford are much more qualified than those from normal State Universities? Is it 100% sure that alumni of great universities are much more likely to become famous such as inventors or scientists? What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, of coure it's not 100% sure. Good schools can help people realize their full potential, but it's not like Stanford cranks out nothing but famous people, and state schools crank out nothing but hair dressers. Self-discipline, interest and personal motivation will take you farther than any degree could on its own.

Honestly, this country is awash in excellent schools, many of which are essentially unheard of. You can obtain a very good education, at a very reasonable price, from a very large number of schools. You don't need to attend Stanford to be successful.

- Warren
 
one of the more eminent profs in my school's department got his phd from syracuse, hardly on anyone's radar for a top physics school (or anything except basketball, i think!).
 
Just going down the list of major stellar astrophysicists, and where they got their PhDs (people I actually know):

Joyce Guzik -- Iowa State (just named Laboratory Fellow, my mentor)
Arthur Cox -- Indiana University (anyone in stellar astrophysics should be familiar with at least some of the work he has done in the past 40 years)
William Pesnell -- University of Florida
Dale Ostlie -- Iowa State
Paul Bradley -- University of Texas at Austin

And that's just what I can think of off the top of my head. Not one of them went to a 'top-ten school', and all have had quite successful careers as scientists.

Seriously, this obsession people have with going to a 'brand-name' school is idiotic. You should be picking grad schools based on specific research interests, not the brochure.
 
are admission to grad schools hard? i am an ugrad so i would like to know.. specifically for maths and physics. the only things i know heck about.

ugrad was sure tough as i am also an international, MIT, caltech, princeton brushed me off like i was a fly on their noses... maybe a DOA in fact. but can't stop my dreams here haha (so corny)

thanks
 
franznietzsche said:
Just going down the list of major stellar astrophysicists, and where they got their PhDs (people I actually know):

Joyce Guzik -- Iowa State (just named Laboratory Fellow, my mentor)
Arthur Cox -- Indiana University (anyone in stellar astrophysics should be familiar with at least some of the work he has done in the past 40 years)
William Pesnell -- University of Florida
Dale Ostlie -- Iowa State
Paul Bradley -- University of Texas at Austin

And that's just what I can think of off the top of my head. Not one of them went to a 'top-ten school', and all have had quite successful careers as scientists.

Seriously, this obsession people have with going to a 'brand-name' school is idiotic. You should be picking grad schools based on specific research interests, not the brochure.

None of the schools you listed there are anything to scoff at though, really.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K