Complementary Angles: A Visual Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcastillo356
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of complementary angles and their geometric interpretations, particularly in relation to reflections across specific lines in a coordinate system.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between angles and their trigonometric functions, questioning the implications of reflections in geometry. There is an attempt to clarify how reflections affect coordinates in a Cartesian plane.

Discussion Status

The conversation appears to be progressing with some participants sharing insights about reflections and their effects on coordinates. However, there is a lack of explicit questions or consensus on the initial statements made regarding complementary angles.

Contextual Notes

Some participants seem to be grappling with the definitions and implications of reflections, indicating a potential gap in understanding the foundational concepts related to complementary angles and their visual representations.

mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
660
Reaction score
364
Homework Statement
Useful identities
Many important properties of ##\cos t## and ##\sin t## are deduced from the fact they are the coordinates of the point ##P_t## in the circunference ##C##, with equation ##x^2+y^2=1##.
Identities of complementary angles
Two angles are complementary if they add up ##\pi/2## (or 90º). The points ##P_{(\pi/2)-t}## and ##P_t## are reflections (one of the other) about the line ##y=x## (Figura P.69), so the ##x## coordinate of one of them is the ##y## coordinate of the other, and vice versa. So
##\cos \left({\dfrac{\pi}´´ 2 -t\right)=\sin t## and ##\sin \left({\dfrac{\pi}2-t}\right)=\cos t##
Relevant Equations
Maybe Thales Theorem?
I thought I understood it until I found the statement mentioned. It's obvious having a look at Figura 3.53:

##\cos \alpha=\dfrac{OP_1}{OP}\Rightarrow{OP_1=\cos \alpha}##,

##\sin \alpha=\dfrac{OP_2}{OP}\Rightarrow{OP_2=OP\cos \left({\dfrac{\pi}{2}-\alpha}\right)=OP\sin \alpha}##

Figure 3.53.jpg
Figure 69.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a question here?
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
Processing...:smile:
 
Well, it's all solved. It was the first time I faced the concept: a reflection can be thought of as a folding or "flipping" an object over the line of reflection. When I reflect a point across the line ##y=x##, the ##x## coordinate and ##y## coordinate change places.
If I reflect over the line ##y=-x## the ##x## coordinate and ##y## coordinate change places and are negated (the signs are changed).
The reflection of the point ##(x,y)## across the line ##y=x## is the point ##(y,x)##.
The reflection of the point ##(x,y)## across the line ##y=-x## is the point ##(-y,-x)##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K