Completely stumped on this one -- Kinematic Conceptual problem

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
34 replies · 5K views
DoctorPhysics said:
I'm just going off an assumption here. Could it be because Xo is prior to your starting point? So anything g behind your initial position is negative?

Of course. Surely you must have seen a "number line" before? East = positive ##x##, west = negative ##x##.

number_line.gif
 

Attachments

  • number_line.gif
    number_line.gif
    948 bytes · Views: 335
Physics news on Phys.org
Now that the problem has been marked "solved", I can contribute a quicker way to get to the answer. The required distance ##x_{min.}## will depend on two independent parameters, the constant speed ##v_0## of the trailing car and the maximum acceleration ##a## of the leading car. The leading car must reach speed ##v_0## over the minimum distance ##x_{min.}##. If it moves slower than that, it started accelerating too late; if it moves faster than that, it started accelerating too soon. Therefore, from the "fourth" kinematic equation $$2ax_{min.}=v_0^2 - 0^2 \rightarrow x_{min.}=\frac{v_0^2}{2a}$$
 
kuruman said:
Now that the problem has been marked "solved", I can contribute a quicker way to get to the answer. The required distance ##x_{min.}## will depend on two independent parameters, the constant speed ##v_0## of the trailing car and the maximum acceleration ##a## of the leading car. The leading car must reach speed ##v_0## over the minimum distance ##x_{min.}##. If it moves slower than that, it started accelerating too late; if it moves faster than that, it started accelerating too soon. Therefore, from the "fourth" kinematic equation $$2ax_{min.}=v_0^2 - 0^2 \rightarrow x_{min.}=\frac{v_0^2}{2a}$$
C.f. post #23.
 
kuruman said:
Sure, but it's not necessary to run time backwards. In either car's reference frame the other car drops its speed from initial speed ##v_0## to zero over distance ##x_{min.}##.
Yes, it is not necessary to run time backwards; I was just trying to make it exactly like the commonest example of the equation.