I Completeness of a basis function

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Function
  • #31
WWGD said:
No, sorry, it has been a while since I have done PDEs or worked with Green's function in general.
No worries, thanks for taking the time!
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
WWGD said:
Not really, sorry. I am a bit confused; your new functions are linear combinations of the previous, so I don't see what you may gain from it. Why not keep the original basis and just use combinations of it?
It is often nice to represent a function in terms of a basis that gives a clean interpretation of the components in the specific current context. So there are reasons to convert from one basis to another, as appropriate.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
FactChecker said:
It is often nice to represent a function in terms of a basis that gives a clean interpretation of the components in the specific current context. So there are reasons to convert from one basis to another, as appropriate.
Yes, the input to the Ritz procedure I employ must satisfy all BCs. As is, the basis functions don't satisfy all the BCs. So we take linearly independent combinations of basis functions to form new basis functions such that the additional BC is satisfied.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
67
Views
7K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K