Complex Analysis-Analytic Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter WannaBe22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Functions
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving or finding a counterexample for the existence of an analytic function f(z) in a pierced neighborhood of z=0 that satisfies f^3(z) = z^2. Participants clarify that f(x) = z^{2/3} is not analytic at z=0 due to the non-existence of its derivative there. The consensus is that while f(z) can be analytic in a neighborhood excluding z=0, it cannot be entire, as it fails to meet the criteria for analyticity at that point. The proof may involve evaluating the integral of the function's derivative around z=0, which is suggested to be non-zero. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the challenges in finding such an analytic function in the specified conditions.
WannaBe22
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove or find a proper counterexample:
There exists an analytic function f(z) in a pierced neighborhood of z=0 (i.e a neighborhood of z=0 , which doesn't contain z=0) which satisfies: f^3 (z) = z^2.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Got no clue...

Hope you'll be able to help me


Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If, by f^3(z), you mean (f(x))^3 and not f(f(f(x))), then all you need to do is show that f(x)= z^{2/3} is analytic everywhere except at z= 0.
 
Actually, it's excatly what I mean, but why the function you gave isn't analytic at 0?
It's actually an entire function...isn't it?

Thanks
 
I didn't say it wasn't- but your problem was to determine if "There exists an analytic function f(z) in a pierced neighborhood of z=0 (i.e a neighborhood of z=0 , which doesn't contain z=0)".

If such a function is analytic everywhere it is certainly analytic in that neighborhood!

But what make you so certain z^{2/3} is analytic at z= 0? It's derivative does not exist there!
 
I think the problem here is to show that you can't have such a function, the best you can do is cut away a branch cut line. Just omitting the point z = 0 is not enough.

I think the proof has to use the integral of the derivative of the function and then show that this integral around the point z = 0 is not zero.
 
Thanks ... I'll try this...
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K