Complex Analysis and Mobius Transformation.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
BrainHurts
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If [itex]\phi \in \mathcal{M}[/itex] (group of all linear fractional transformations or Mobius Transformations has three fixed points, then it must be the identity. (The proof should exploit the fact that [itex]\mathcal{M}[/itex] is a group.





The Attempt at a Solution



Hi all,

So the book I'm reading is "Complex Made Simple" by David C. Ullrich. and this is Exercise 8.5 if anyone has done this.

Anyway this is what I was thinking.

Let [itex]\phi_j \in \mathcal{M}[/itex] where [itex]j = 1,2[/itex] and let [itex]\phi_j(z_i) = z_i[/itex] for [itex]i = 1,2,3[/itex]

So we see that [itex]z_i = \phi_{j}^{-1}(z_i)[/itex], we know that [itex]\phi_{j}^{-1}[/itex] since their elements of the group [itex]\mathcal{M}[/itex]

My question would be this, if I define a map [itex]\phi = \phi_{2}^{-1} \circ \phi_{1}[/itex] and show that that [itex]\phi_1 = \phi_2[/itex] is that enough to show that [itex]\phi[/itex] is the identity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is because the identity element and the inverse element is unique.