Complex Analysis - Taylor series of 1/(1+exp(z))

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on computing the first four terms of the Taylor series for the function \( \frac{1}{1+e^{z}} \) at \( z_{0} = 0 \) and determining its radius of convergence. The radius of convergence is established as \( |z| < \pi \), since the function is not analytic at \( z = i\pi \). The computed Taylor series terms are \( \frac{1}{2} - \frac{z}{4} + \frac{z^{3}}{48} - \frac{z^{5}}{480} + \ldots \). The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly substituting series expansions and the necessity of expanding to the appropriate order.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series expansions
  • Familiarity with complex analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of the exponential function \( e^{z} \)
  • Ability to manipulate power series and geometric series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Taylor series for complex functions
  • Learn about the properties of analytic functions in complex analysis
  • Explore the geometric series expansion and its applications
  • Investigate the convergence criteria for power series in complex variables
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as anyone involved in advanced calculus or mathematical series expansions.

LoA
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Compute the first four terms of the Taylor series of \frac{1}{1+e^{z}} at z_{0} = 0 and give it's radius of convergence.

Homework Equations



e^{z} = \sum\frac{z^{n}}{n!} = 1 + z +\frac{z^{2}}{2!} + \frac{z^{3}}{3!} + o(z^{3})

\frac{1}{1+w} = \sum(-1)^{n}w^{n} = 1 - w + w^{2} - w^{3} + o(w^{3})

The Attempt at a Solution



First let's look at the radius of convergence. Since e^{z} converges for all z, the only thing that matters is \left|w\right| &lt; 1 where w = e^{z}.

So I have to solve \left|e^{z}\right| &lt; 1. Easy enough. (or just observe that exp(z) = -1 when z = iπ)

-1 &lt; e^{z} &lt; 1 \Rightarrow Log(-1) &lt; z &lt; Log(1) \Rightarrow -i\pi &lt; z &lt; 0 \Rightarrow \left|z\right| &lt; \left|i\pi\right| = \pi

So the series will converge for \left|z\right| &lt; \pi

So much for that. Now down to brass tacks, computing the terms. Working out the derivatives at z_{0} = 0 (and double checking with wolfram) gives me:

\frac{1}{2} - \frac{z}{4} + \frac{z^{3}}{48} - \frac{z^{5}}{480} +...

But when I try to arrive at the same form by subbing the series for exp(z) into the geometric series, I get something A) different, and B) messy. I'll write it out upon request, but not tonight, I've been at this way too long. My suspicion is that in order to get the first four terms that way would require way more algebra than it's worth, but I'd like to at least figure out if I'm on the right track...

Questions: Do I need to expand the terms to a higher order? When substituting the series expansion for one function into the series expansion of another, is it necessary to expand each series out to the exact same order? We worked a few problems like this in class the other day, computing things like e^{sin(z^{2})} and I thought I understood at the time, but now I'm not quite so sure...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think its better to expand \frac{1}{1+e^z} directly!
 
LoA said:

Homework Statement



Compute the first four terms of the Taylor series of \frac{1}{1+e^{z}} at z_{0} = 0 and give it's radius of convergence.

Homework Equations



e^{z} = \sum\frac{z^{n}}{n!} = 1 + z +\frac{z^{2}}{2!} + \frac{z^{3}}{3!} + o(z^{3})

\frac{1}{1+w} = \sum(-1)^{n}w^{n} = 1 - w + w^{2} - w^{3} + o(w^{3})

The Attempt at a Solution



First let's look at the radius of convergence. Since e^{z} converges for all z, the only thing that matters is \left|w\right| &lt; 1 where w = e^{z}.

So I have to solve \left|e^{z}\right| &lt; 1. Easy enough. (or just observe that exp(z) = -1 when z = iπ)

-1 &lt; e^{z} &lt; 1
That doesn't make sense. Complex numbers can't be ordered like that.

\Rightarrow Log(-1) &lt; z &lt; Log(1) \Rightarrow -i\pi &lt; z &lt; 0 \Rightarrow \left|z\right| &lt; \left|i\pi\right| = \pi

So the series will converge for \left|z\right| &lt; \pi
Think about this. You're saying, for example, that if ##z=3 < \pi##, then ##e^z = e^3 < 1##.

Try using ##e^z = e^{x+iy} = e^x e^{iy}##.

So much for that. Now down to brass tacks, computing the terms. Working out the derivatives at z_{0} = 0 (and double checking with wolfram) gives me:

\frac{1}{2} - \frac{z}{4} + \frac{z^{3}}{48} - \frac{z^{5}}{480} +...

But when I try to arrive at the same form by subbing the series for exp(z) into the geometric series, I get something A) different, and B) messy. I'll write it out upon request, but not tonight, I've been at this way too long. My suspicion is that in order to get the first four terms that way would require way more algebra than it's worth, but I'd like to at least figure out if I'm on the right track...
I suspect you're writing ##1+e^z+(e^z)^2+\cdots## and substituting in the series for ##e^z##. That won't work because every term will contribute to all orders. You want to expand ##e^z## as a series in ##\frac{1}{1+e^z}##, and then expand the result as a geometric series.

Questions: Do I need to expand the terms to a higher order? When substituting the series expansion for one function into the series expansion of another, is it necessary to expand each series out to the exact same order? We worked a few problems like this in class the other day, computing things like e^{sin(z^{2})} and I thought I understood at the time, but now I'm not quite so sure...
 
As for the radius of convergence, a power series for a function of a complex variable will converge as long as there "is no problem". Here, e^{i\pi}= -1 so that the denominator is 0. This function is not analytic at z= i\pi but is for all z closer to 0 so its radius of convergence is \pi.
 
LoA said:
[
Questions: Do I need to expand the terms to a higher order? When substituting the series expansion for one function into the series expansion of another, is it necessary to expand each series out to the exact same order? We worked a few problems like this in class the other day, computing things like e^{sin(z^{2})} and I thought I understood at the time, but now I'm not quite so sure...

You can't just muscle-through long division huh?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K