Complex Conjugates: f*(z) = f(z*)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BackEMF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between analytic functions and their complex conjugates, specifically the equation f(z*) = f*(z) for analytic functions f(z). Participants highlight the Reflection Principle and the Identity Theorem as methods for proving this relationship. They emphasize the importance of Taylor series with real coefficients and the property that the complex conjugate of a complex variable raised to a power equals the power of the complex conjugate. The conversation concludes with a note on the simplicity of the proof using polar form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of analytic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with Taylor series and their convergence
  • Knowledge of complex conjugates and their operations
  • Basic comprehension of the Cauchy-Riemann equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Reflection Principle in complex analysis
  • Learn about the Identity Theorem and its applications
  • Explore the derivation of Taylor series for complex functions
  • Investigate the use of polar coordinates in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of analytic functions and their conjugates.

BackEMF
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
It's commonly known that if f(z) is analytic, then

f(z*) = f*(z)

that is, an analytic function of the complex conjugate is equal to the complex conjugate of the function...with the proviso that f(x+i0) = f(x) = Re f(x)

I've tried to prove it using the C-R equations but I'm not having much luck. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a function is analytic, then near each point in its domain, it's equal to its Taylor series (which has a positive radius of convergence)
 
This is known as the Reflection Principle in textbooks.

The two functions f(x) and g(x) := \overline{f(\overline{x})} are both analytic and they agree on the real line, which is a set with a limit point, therefore they agree everywhere.
 
Excellent.

Should have spotted the method where you write it as a Taylor series (necessarily with real coefficients, I guess, since the function's restriction to the real line must be real, as stated above) then apply complex conjugation to this series - then it just boils down to showing that the complex conjugate of a complex variable raised to a power is the power of the complex congugate of the variable. In other words

<br /> (z^n)^{*} = (z^{*})^n<br />

which isn't too hard, I hope!

The Identity Theorem method is a bit more sublte, but it makes sense.

Thanks Hurkyl, g_edgar.
 
BackEMF said:
Excellent.

Should have spotted the method where you write it as a Taylor series (necessarily with real coefficients, I guess, since the function's restriction to the real line must be real, as stated above) then apply complex conjugation to this series - then it just boils down to showing that the complex conjugate of a complex variable raised to a power is the power of the complex congugate of the variable. In other words

<br /> (z^n)^{*} = (z^{*})^n<br />

which isn't too hard, I hope!
Note that this is actually trivial if you use the polar form.
 
nrqed said:
Note that this is actually trivial if you use the polar form.

Yep, was just thinking that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K