Complex Conjugates: f*(z) = f(z*)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BackEMF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of analytic functions and their relationship with complex conjugates, specifically focusing on the equation f(z*) = f*(z). Participants explore methods of proof, including Taylor series and the Reflection Principle, while addressing the implications of these properties in complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that if f(z) is analytic, then f(z*) = f*(z), with a condition regarding the behavior of f on the real line.
  • Another participant mentions that an analytic function is equal to its Taylor series near each point in its domain.
  • A third participant refers to the Reflection Principle, asserting that two functions, f(x) and g(x) = \overline{f(\overline{x})}, are analytic and agree on the real line, leading to agreement everywhere.
  • Several participants discuss the application of Taylor series with real coefficients and the process of applying complex conjugation to this series, emphasizing the relationship between powers of complex variables and their conjugates.
  • One participant notes that using polar form simplifies the proof significantly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and perspectives on proving the relationship between analytic functions and their complex conjugates. There is no consensus on a single method, and some participants appear to agree on the validity of multiple approaches while others explore different angles.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumption that the function is analytic and the dependence on the behavior of the function on the real line. The discussion does not resolve the intricacies of the methods mentioned, such as the Identity Theorem or the implications of using polar form.

BackEMF
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
It's commonly known that if f(z) is analytic, then

f(z*) = f*(z)

that is, an analytic function of the complex conjugate is equal to the complex conjugate of the function...with the proviso that f(x+i0) = f(x) = Re f(x)

I've tried to prove it using the C-R equations but I'm not having much luck. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a function is analytic, then near each point in its domain, it's equal to its Taylor series (which has a positive radius of convergence)
 
This is known as the Reflection Principle in textbooks.

The two functions f(x) and g(x) := \overline{f(\overline{x})} are both analytic and they agree on the real line, which is a set with a limit point, therefore they agree everywhere.
 
Excellent.

Should have spotted the method where you write it as a Taylor series (necessarily with real coefficients, I guess, since the function's restriction to the real line must be real, as stated above) then apply complex conjugation to this series - then it just boils down to showing that the complex conjugate of a complex variable raised to a power is the power of the complex congugate of the variable. In other words

<br /> (z^n)^{*} = (z^{*})^n<br />

which isn't too hard, I hope!

The Identity Theorem method is a bit more sublte, but it makes sense.

Thanks Hurkyl, g_edgar.
 
BackEMF said:
Excellent.

Should have spotted the method where you write it as a Taylor series (necessarily with real coefficients, I guess, since the function's restriction to the real line must be real, as stated above) then apply complex conjugation to this series - then it just boils down to showing that the complex conjugate of a complex variable raised to a power is the power of the complex congugate of the variable. In other words

<br /> (z^n)^{*} = (z^{*})^n<br />

which isn't too hard, I hope!
Note that this is actually trivial if you use the polar form.
 
nrqed said:
Note that this is actually trivial if you use the polar form.

Yep, was just thinking that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K