Complex Fourier Transform & Its Inverse (also Dcontour integrals)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complex Fourier Transform of the function f(x) defined as f(x) = e^{2x} (x<0) and f(x) = e^{-x} (x>0). The derived transform is F(k) = {3(k^{2} + ik + 2)}/{(k^{2}+1)(k^{2} + 4)}. The user attempts to verify the inverse transform using a D-contour integral, identifying poles at k=i, -i, and -2i. An algebraic error in the rationalized form of F(k) led to an incorrect factor of 2 in the inverse transform, which was clarified through further analysis and correction of a squaring mistake.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex Fourier Transforms
  • Knowledge of D-contour integrals
  • Familiarity with residue theorem in complex analysis
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of complex functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex Fourier Transforms
  • Learn about D-contour integration techniques
  • Explore the residue theorem and its applications in inverse transforms
  • Review common algebraic errors in complex function manipulation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on signal processing, complex analysis, and Fourier methods.

MathematicalPhysics
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
For the function [tex]f(x)[/tex] given by:
[tex]f(x) = e^{2x} (x<0), = e^{-x} (x>0)[/tex]
I have got the complex Fourier Transform to be:
[tex]F(k) = {3(k^{2} + ik + 2)}/{(k^{2}+1)(k^{2} + 4)}[/tex]
Now I'm trying to verify the formula for the inverse transform by using a D-contour integral. Just taking the x>0 case I have found the strip of regularity and am closing the D- contour below (to avoid the exponential exploding).
Closing the contour below gives 3 poles in the contour, namely:
[tex]k=i,-i,-2i[/tex]
I have "argued away" the curve of the Dcontour okay.
So now computing the sum of the residues and multiplying by (-2pi i) should give me back:
[tex]f(x) = e^{-x}[/tex]
The residues at k= i and k= -2i are zero so just working on k= -i:
[tex]res = {3(k^{2}+ik+2)e^{-ikx}}/{4k^{3} + 10k}[/tex]
I got this by just differentiating bottom line (trick for getting formula for res)
when k = -i this gives:
[tex]res = {-2e^{-x}}/(i)[/tex]
multiplying by (-2pi i) and dividing by 2pi (according to inv transform formula) gives..
[tex]f(x) = 2e^{-x}[/tex]
why have I got that 2?!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you back up a step, your transform is

[tex]F(k) = \frac {3}{(k + i ) (k - 2i)}[/tex]

which gives the correct inverse transform so you have made an algebraic error using the "rationalized" form.

Incidentally, when you close the contour in the lower half plane you don't encounter the pole at k = i at all.
 
Thanks Tide.

I made an error in squaring -i! All that work and I just couldn't see my mistake at all.

Sleeping on it helped a lot!

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K