How can I use spherical coordinates to simplify the Fourier transform equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simplifying the Fourier transform equation using spherical coordinates. The equation presented is $$V(k)=\sigma_1^x\nabla_1^x\sigma_2^y\nabla_2^y\frac{1}{|\vec{r_2}-\vec{r_1}|}e^{-m|\vec{r_2}-\vec{r_1}|}e^{-ik(r_2-r_1)}$$, which involves terms related to Yukawa potential and requires integration techniques. The key takeaway is the necessity of applying spherical coordinates to express the distance between points, specifically using the formula $$|r_{1} - r_{2}|^2= |r_{1}|^2 +|r_{2}|^2-2r_{1}r_{2}cos\theta$$. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of understanding the gradient in spherical coordinates for further simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transform equations
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates
  • Knowledge of gradient operations in vector calculus
  • Basic concepts of Yukawa potential
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of spherical coordinates in Fourier transforms
  • Learn about the gradient in spherical coordinates
  • Explore integration techniques relevant to Fourier transforms
  • Research the Yukawa potential and its Fourier representation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with Fourier transforms, particularly those interested in potential theory and wave equations.

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
(This is part of a longer problem) Write the following potential in the momentum space:
$$V(r_1-r_2)=(\vec{\sigma_1}\cdot\vec{\nabla_1})(\vec{\sigma_2}\cdot\vec{\nabla_2})\frac{1}{|\vec{r_2}-\vec{r_1}|}e^{-m|\vec{r_2}-\vec{r_1}|}$$ where ##\sigma## is the Pauli matrix.
Relevant Equations
$$\phi(k)=\frac{1}{(\sqrt{2\pi})^3}\int{\psi(r)e^{-ik\cdot r}}d^3r$$
By applying the Fourier transform equation, and expanding the dot product, I get a sum of terms of the form: $$V(k)=\sigma_1^x\nabla_1^x\sigma_2^y\nabla_2^y\frac{1}{|\vec{r_2}-\vec{r_1}|}e^{-m|\vec{r_2}-\vec{r_1}|}e^{-ik(r_2-r_1)} = \sigma_1^x\sigma_2^y\nabla_1^x\nabla_2^y\frac{1}{|\vec{r_2}-\vec{r_1}|}e^{-m|\vec{r_2}-\vec{r_1}|} e^{-ik(r_2-r_1)} $$ But I don't really know what to do with this. Integration by parts doesn't seem to help too much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple of things that I think you are needing for this problem:
1) https://math.stackexchange.com/ques...awa-potential-fourier-representation-integral
2) Follow these simple steps if you can:
## \psi(r)=\frac{1}{2 \pi} \int d^3k \, \hat{\psi}(k) e^{ik \cdot r} ##.
## \nabla \psi(r)=\frac{1}{2 \pi} \int d^3k \, ik \hat{\psi}(k) e^{ik \cdot r} ##.
This last equation is the result that ## ik \hat{\psi}(k) ## is necessarily the F.T. of ## \nabla \psi ##.
Some additional work might be in order to complete this problem, and I'm not even sure I would know how to finish it up, but perhaps what I gave you will help.
 
Try using spherical coordinates. In these coordinates ##|r_{1} - r_{2}|^2= |r_{1}|^2 +|r_{2}|^2-2r_{1}r_{2}cos\theta##. Also look up gradient in spherical coordinate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K