Complex operations, bra-ket notation, confusion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics, specifically within the context of the Stern-Gerlach experiment as outlined in McIntyre's textbook. The user expresses confusion regarding the representation of state vectors, particularly the coefficients' complex nature and their physical implications. The key conclusion is that while each coefficient in the state vector can be complex, only the relative phases between components are physically meaningful, allowing for simplifications such as setting one coefficient to be real and positive.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Stern-Gerlach experiment
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their representation
  • Basic principles of quantum state vectors and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of phase factors in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the mathematical representation of quantum states using bra-ket notation
  • Explore the derivation of state vectors in various quantum experiments
  • Investigate the significance of relative phase in quantum interference phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with quantum states, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of bra-ket notation and its applications in experimental physics.

demoncore
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Sorry for disregarding the template; I'm not really working out a homework problem as much as just trying to follow the reasoning in the text. I'm working through the first chapter of Quantum Mechanics, McIntyre, and I'm a little bit confused by the following.

The text introduces bra-ket notation in the context of the Stern-Gerlach experiment, deriving some results having to do with the spin measured along various axes and relating it to the state vector. (Please read the _ sign as a subscript)

They write the 'general form' of the S_x state kets in terms of the S-z bases kets:

|+>_x = a |+> + b |->
|->_x = c |+> + d |->,

They also have the following experimental results:

|<+|+>|^2 = |<-|+>|^2 = |<+|->|^2 = |<-|->^2 = 0.5 (all S_x state vectors)

expanding and equating they find that |a|^2 = |b|^2 = |c|^2 = |d|^2 = 0.5

This is the paragraph that confuses me--I think it might be my unfamiliarity with complex operations:
Because each coefficient is complex, each has an amplitude and phase. However, the overall phase of a quantum state vector is not physically meaningful. Only the relative phase between different components of the state vector is physically measurable. Hence, we are free to choose one coefficient of each vector to be real and positive without any loss of generality. This allows us to write the desired states as:

|+>_x = (1/√2) [ |+> + e^(iα) |->]
|->_x = (1/√2) [ |+> + e^(iβ) |->]

I am a little confused by the reasoning here. I suppose |a|^2 = (1/√2) => a = (1/√2) * e^(iθ); the absolute phase of the state vector doesn't matter, so we are free to take θ= 0 for one coefficient of each vector?

Please correct any terminology/reasoning errors I have made here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose [since] the absolute phase of the state vector doesn't matter, so we are free to take θ= 0 for one coefficient of each vector?
That's what I read.
Where you are free to pick a relationship, pick one that makes the math easy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K