Complex Solution to an Exponential Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation (1+a)^n = (1-a)^n, where a is a complex number and n is a natural number. Participants explore the implications of this equation, particularly focusing on the nature of complex solutions and the use of Euler's formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss rewriting the equation in terms of complex numbers and explore the implications of the n-th degree. There are attempts to express a in terms of real and imaginary components, and questions about the number of solutions to the equation zn = 1 are raised. Some participants suggest using exponential notation for simplification.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on manipulating the equation and expressing a in terms of k. There is recognition of potential pitfalls, such as division by zero, and suggestions for simplifying expressions further. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of avoiding division by zero in their derivations, particularly when n = 2k. The discussion includes considerations of how to handle complex numbers and the need to simplify expressions appropriately.

cdummie
Messages
147
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Solve the following equation: ## (1+a)^n=(1-a)^n## where a is complex number and n is natural number

Homework Equations


Euler's formula

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried something like this

##
(1+a)^n=(1-a)^n \\

(\frac{1+a}{1-a})^n=1 ##

But i really have no idea what to do next, since that n-th degree complicates things, i mean i could write a as a= x+iy where x and y are real numbers but it won't help much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about numbers z that satisfy zn = 1? In particular, how many are there?
 
mfb said:
What do you know about numbers z that satisfy zn = 1? In particular, how many are there?

Well, there are n solutions to such equation, ##z=cos\frac{2\pi +2k\pi}{n} + isin\frac{2\pi +2k\pi}{n}##
 
Right. Using the ##r e^{i \phi}## notation is probably easier in the next steps.
 
mfb said:
Right. Using the ##r e^{i \phi}## notation is probably easier in the next steps.

Ok, so, i have ##\frac{1+a}{1-a}=e^{i\frac{2k\pi}{n}}## , but i should find a, what should i do next? Since a is complex number a=x +iy (x, y are real numbers) and then if i multiply and divide LHS by by 1-x +iy it doesn't seem like it gets me any closer to the solution.
 
Why not? e^{i\frac{2k\pi}{n}} is a constant. If it is bothering you, call it "k". Then \frac{1+ a}{1- a}= k which we can write 1+ a= k(1- a)= k- ka. Can you solve that equation for a? Then, if you need to, write a as x+ iy to solve for x and y.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Why not? e^{i\frac{2k\pi}{n}} is a constant. If it is bothering you, call it "k". Then \frac{1+ a}{1- a}= k which we can write 1+ a= k(1- a)= k- ka. Can you solve that equation for a? Then, if you need to, write a as x+ iy to solve for x and y.

Well, i think it could go this way:

## 1+a=k-ka \\ a+ka=k-1 \\ a=\frac{k-1}{k+1} \\ a=\frac{e^{i\frac{2k\pi}{n}}-1}{e^{i\frac{2k\pi}{n}}+1} ##

Is this correct?
 
cdummie said:
Well, i think it could go this way:

## 1+a=k-ka \\ a+ka=k-1 \\ a=\frac{k-1}{k+1} \\ a=\frac{e^{i\frac{2k\pi}{n}}-1}{e^{i\frac{2k\pi}{n}}+1} ##

Is this correct?
Looks on track, but ...
What happens when ##\frac{k}{n}=\frac{1}{2}##?
 
Samy_A said:
Looks on track, but ...
What happens when ##\frac{k}{n}=\frac{1}{2}##?

I think i know what are you trying to say, denominator can't be zero, so this works for every k and n except when n=2k.
 
  • #10
cdummie said:
I think i know what are you trying to say, denominator can't be zero, so this works for every k and n except when n=2k.

Yes, but can you simply that expression you have?
 
  • #11
cdummie said:
I think i know what are you trying to say, denominator can't be zero, so this works for every k and n except when n=2k.
Indeed, because in your derivation you at a point divided by ##e^{i\frac{2k\pi}{n}}+1##, and that doesn't work if that value is 0.
As @PeroK suggested, you can simplify your result.
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
Yes, but can you simply that expression you have?

Let's see, i guess i could multiply numerator and denominator by ## cos\frac{2k\pi}{n} + 1 - sin\frac{2k\pi}{n} ## is this the thing i should do?
 
  • #13
There is no need to start with cosine and sine. How can you expand every fraction to make its denominator real?
 
  • #14
mfb said:
There is no need to start with cosine and sine. How can you expand every fraction to make its denominator real?

Well, if it's complex number, i can do that by multiplying with it's conjugate, that's what i did, i can't remember something else.
 
  • #15
Right, multiply both sides with its complex conjugate (but don't use sine and cosine, they just make it messy).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K