I Compton scattering amplitude and propagator

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the propagator in the context of Compton scattering amplitude. The responder emphasizes that the explanation will depend on the participant's background in quantum field theory (QFT). They inquire about the individual's familiarity with concepts like quantizing the Dirac field and understanding propagation amplitudes. Clarifying the level of knowledge in QFT is essential for providing an appropriate response. The conversation highlights the importance of tailoring explanations to the audience's expertise in the subject.
Dhmht_Kr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone
How can i prove that the propagator is
1681501906264.png

And then
1681501970004.png
 

Attachments

  • 1681501897142.png
    1681501897142.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 130
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm afraid answering your questions will depend on the background you'd like the explanation to be standing in. In other words, what level of QFT physics you are interested in? For instance, can I assume you're aware of how to quantize the Dirac field and then get its propagation amplitudes?

If you let me know your overall level in QFT, I might be able to answer the above questions.
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...