What happens if photon propagator goes on shell?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the forward Compton scattering process e(p)+γ(k) -> e(p)+γ(k) and the implications of the photon propagator becoming on-shell with k^2 = p^2 = 0. This situation leads to divergences in the cross section due to the exchange of zero-momentum photons, which must be regulated by the emission of soft photons. The divergence occurs at the cross section level, not at the amplitude level, and is elaborated in QFT textbooks such as Peskin-Schröder, specifically in chapter 6. The analysis highlights the necessity of implementing a cutoff for soft photon detection to manage these divergences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of forward Compton scattering
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory (QFT) concepts
  • Knowledge of photon propagators and their properties
  • Experience with cross section calculations and divergences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the forward Compton scattering process in detail
  • Review chapter 6 of "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" by Peskin and Schroeder
  • Learn about soft and collinear divergences in quantum field theory
  • Explore methods for regulating divergences in cross section calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, particle physicists, and researchers involved in scattering processes and divergence regulation will benefit from this discussion.

Chenkb
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
I am thinking about a problem. Consider the forward Compton scattering process e(p)+γ(k) -> e(p)+γ(k), as shown in the following figure.
If we consider the initial red photon is emitted by another electron which then goes to anything, then how can we write down the whole amplitude for this process?
The problem troubles me is that the red photon becomes a propagator with k^2 = p^2 = 0, which is divergent if in the denominator!

hkbd=0&chkpc=&dp-logid=5282071386005119170&dp-callid=0&size=c710_u400&quality=100&vuk=-&ft=video.png
 

Attachments

  • hkbd=0&chkpc=&dp-logid=5282071386005119170&dp-callid=0&size=c710_u400&quality=100&vuk=-&ft=video.png
    hkbd=0&chkpc=&dp-logid=5282071386005119170&dp-callid=0&size=c710_u400&quality=100&vuk=-&ft=video.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 626
Physics news on Phys.org
The photon will not be on-shell for anything where you can measure a momentum difference between the particles it attach to at the top.

For an actual cross section computation you have to put a cutoff on how soft photons you can detect and the divergence in the cross section due to the exchange of zero-momentum photons will be regulated by the emission of soft photons. This occurs at the cross section level, not at the amplitude level.

Formally, if you consider a series of detectors that each can measure lower and lower energy soft photons, the cross section diverges. This should be discussed in any QFT textbook, e.g., the discussion in Peskin-Schröder is in chapter 6.
 
Orodruin said:
The photon will not be on-shell for anything where you can measure a momentum difference between the particles it attach to at the top.

For an actual cross section computation you have to put a cutoff on how soft photons you can detect and the divergence in the cross section due to the exchange of zero-momentum photons will be regulated by the emission of soft photons. This occurs at the cross section level, not at the amplitude level.

Formally, if you consider a series of detectors that each can measure lower and lower energy soft photons, the cross section diverges. This should be discussed in any QFT textbook, e.g., the discussion in Peskin-Schröder is in chapter 6.
Thanks a lot. This reminds me that the red photon no-longer has a definite momentum, and the situation is similar to the case of understanding soft or collinear divergences.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K