Compton Scattering formula for 180 degree scattering.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving a formula for Compton scattering specifically for the case of 180° scattering. Participants explore the relationship between the wavelengths before and after scattering, as well as the underlying principles of conservation of momentum and energy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for 180° scattering: \(\frac{1}{\lambda}-\frac{1}{\lambda'} = \frac{2m_ec}{h}\) and expresses difficulty in simplifying it to \(\lambda' - \lambda = \frac{2h}{m_ec}\).
  • Another participant suggests a multiplication approach leading to \((\lambda' - \lambda)^2 = 4\lambda' \lambda\) and provides a ratio \(\lambda'/\lambda = 3 \pm 2\sqrt{2}\), questioning the derivation of the initial equation.
  • A participant claims to have derived the first formula using conservation laws at non-relativistic speeds, while the second formula is stated to come from the standard Compton scattering formula.
  • Further elaboration on conservation of momentum and energy equations is provided, indicating a substitution method used to reach the initial formula.
  • Links to external resources are shared, but one participant notes that the referenced derivation is relativistic and does not align with their non-relativistic approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the simplification of the formulas or the derivation methods, indicating that multiple approaches and understandings exist within the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions related to non-relativistic speeds and the applicability of different derivation methods, which are not fully resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in Compton scattering, particularly those exploring different derivation methods and the implications of relativistic versus non-relativistic approaches.

durand
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm trying to derive a simple formula for 180° scattering.

I've got to this stage and I really can't figure out how to simplify it further.

[tex]\[ \frac{1}{\lambda}-\frac{1}{\lambda'} = \frac{2m_ec}{h} \][/tex]

What I actually need is:
[tex]\[ \lambda' - \lambda = \frac{2h}{m_ec} \][/tex]

I'm pretty sure the first formula is right but I can't seem to simplify it into the second!

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi durand! :smile:

(have a lambda: λ :wink:)

If you multiply them together, you get (λ' - λ)2 = 4λ'λ, or λ'/λ = 3 ± 2√2 :redface:

How did you get your equation?
 
Uhm, I derived the first using conservation of momentum and energy at non relativistic speeds, when the photon bounces back. The second comes from the standard compton scattering formula.
 
CoM: h/λ = mv + h/λ'
CoE: hc/λ = hc/λ' + 0.5mv²

By substituting one into the other, I reach the formula I mentioned in my first post.
 
Bob S said:

Yeah, I did find that, however, it uses a relativistic derivation so I can't really see how to do the last step as it's totally different to mine :/ Thanks anyway.

My exam's in an hour so it doesn't really matter now. Thanks everyone for your help :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K