Compton Scattering of a photon by a moving electron

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 7K views
athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the total energy of the electron E>>m[itex]c^{2}[/itex]
Prove that the formula of wavelength would be
[itex]\lambda '[/itex]=[itex]\frac{hc}{E}[/itex](1+[itex]\frac{m^{2}c^{4}\lambda}{4hcE}[/itex])
where [itex]\lambda '[/itex] is the wavelength after scattering
m is the mass of electron

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have proved that [itex]\lambda '[/itex]=[itex]\frac{\lambda(E-Pc)+2hc}{E+Pc}[/itex]
In my equation, P is the initial momentum of the electron.
I haven't use the given assumption E>>m[itex]c^{2}[/itex]. So we must use it to eliminate P.

But if E>>m[itex]c^{2}[/itex][itex]\Rightarrow[/itex] E[itex]\approx[/itex]Pc
this cannot get the answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
they are both along x axis, even after collision

The origin question should be
Consider Comton scattering of a photon by a moving electron. Before the collision the photon has wave length λ and is moving in the +x direction, and the electron is moving in the -x direction with total energy E. The photon and electron collide head-on. After the collision both are moving in the -x direction.
(a) Drive an expression for the wavelength λ' of the scattered photon.
(b) Show that for the case E>>mc^2, the result reduces to [itex]\lambda '[/itex]=[itex]\frac{hc}{E}[/itex](1+[itex]\frac{m^{2}c^{4}\lambda}{4hcE}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
vela said:
OK, you have
$$\lambda' = \frac{\lambda(E-Pc)+2hc}{E+Pc} = \frac{2hc}{E+Pc} + \lambda\frac{E-Pc}{E+Pc}$$
The second term will become zero after using E=Pc, since the second term has the factor E-Pc.