Computational Newton's second law problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a computational problem related to Newton's second law, specifically involving a block being pushed by a force that decreases over time and experiencing a constant friction force. The objective is to determine when the block stops moving and the distance it travels, despite the absence of mass information.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of missing mass on solving the differential equation derived from Newton's second law. Questions arise about the conditions necessary for the block to continue moving and the assumptions that can be made regarding initial velocity and mass.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights on how to approach the problem despite the missing information. Some suggest that the time for the block to stop may be independent of mass, while others note that the distance traveled will depend on mass. There is a recognition of the need for assumptions to progress in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

Key constraints include the lack of specified mass and initial velocity, which are critical for numerical solutions. Participants are considering how these missing elements affect the overall problem-solving process.

Hobold
Messages
82
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



This is actually a very elementar Halliday's computational problem:

One person pushes a block with a force given by the equation [tex]F = 200e^{-0.15t}[/tex] (given in Newtons and seconds) and the block has, with the surface, a constant friction force of 80N. Find when the block stops moving and the distance moved.

Homework Equations



Newton's second law

The Attempt at a Solution



Considering Newton's second law, the problem seems to be obtaining the solution of the following differential equation:

[tex]200e^{-0.15t} - 80 = m \left( \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} \right)[/tex]

This would actually be easy, though no mass is given. How can I solve numerically this equation not knowing the mass? Both Runge-Kutta and Euler's methods require it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Under what conditions will the block keep moving?
 
Velocity must not be null, though you can't solve for velocity if you don't have mass
 
Hobold said:
Velocity must not be null,...

That's not quite what I intended to ask :smile: Rather than, "how can you tell that the block is moving", Under what conditions will the block continue to move? What is making the block move in the first place?

It may be that there is not enough information given for a particular numerical answer; you may have to make some assumptions for that. For example, no initial velocity is given. Will you assume that it is zero? No particular mass is specified. Will you provide an expression for an answer rather than a numerical value, or will you pick a mass value and get on with it...?

You should be able (I think) to determine expressions for the acceleration, velocity, and position. Given that you know all the forces involved, the acceleration is accessible...

...and it just may be that it turns out that the time when the velocity goes to zero is independent of the mass... :wink:
 
Last edited:
If you assume that v0 = 0, then the time it takes for the block to come to rest is independent of the mass.

To find the time, notice that d2x/dt2 = dv/dt. Use this in your equation and integrate both sides w.r.t time, t. Then set v = 0 and solve for t (numerically or graphically).

The distance the block travels does depend on the mass.
 
Thank you very much, I solved it, though there is no way you can solve for distance, right? I mean without assuming anything about mass.
 
Last edited:
Hobold said:
Thank you very much, I solved it, though there is no way you can solve for distance, right? I mean without assuming anything about mass.

You can find an expression for the distance that depends upon mass.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
1K