Compute lower and upper sum for Riemann integral

rayman123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


let [tex]f(x)=x^2[/tex] Calculate upper sum and lower sum on the interval [tex][-2,2][/tex] when n=2

The Attempt at a Solution


since n=2 I divide the interval into
[tex][-2,0]\cup[0,2][/tex]

then on the interval [tex][-2,0][/tex] the function [tex]f(x)=x^2[/tex] has the highest valute at [tex]x=-2, f(-2)=4=M_{0}[/tex] and the lowest value is at [tex]x=0, f(0)=0=m_{0}[/tex]

on the interval the situation is the same [tex]x=0, f(0)=0=m_{1}[/tex](again the lowest value) ,and at [tex]x=2, f(2)=4=M_{1}[/tex](the highest value)

thus upper sum will be
[tex]S_{n}=M_{0}\cdot \Delta x+M_{1}\cdot \Delta x[/tex] where [tex]\Delta x=2[/tex]
[tex]S_{n}=4\cdot 2+4\cdot 2=16[/tex]
lower sum
[tex]s_{n}=0\cdot 2+0\cdot 2=0[/tex]
and here I am a bit confused cause in my homework it says'' if you calculated correctly then the difference between lower sum and upper sum should be 16'' well here it would not work...where do I make mistake?

any help appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rayman123 said:
[tex]4\cdot 2+4\cdot 2=8[/tex]

This does not look correct...
 
micromass said:
This does not look correct...
it should be 16, it was a typo but this still does not show me the error
 
Isn't the difference between the lower sum and the upper sum 16 now??
 
the difference is [tex]s_{n}-S_{n}=-16[/tex]
 
Yeah, of course since [itex]S_n[/itex] is always larger than [itex]s_n[/itex].

But with difference, they don't literally mean [itex]s_n-S_n[/itex] here. Rather, they mean something like [itex]|s_n-S_n|[/itex].
 
thank you :) now I see
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K