Undergrad Computing Riemann Tensor: 18 Predicted Non-Trivial Terms

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the Riemann Tensor for a specific diagonal metric and predicting the number of non-trivial components. The author predicts 18 potential non-trivial terms based on the properties of the Riemann tensor, including antisymmetry and symmetry rules. However, upon using Mathematica, only 12 non-trivial terms are confirmed, with three specific terms yielding non-zero values. The author notes the existence of an additional non-trivial term that remains unaccounted for and seeks assistance in identifying the oversight. The inquiry emphasizes the complexities involved in tensor calculations within the context of general relativity.
JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156
TL;DR
I want to understand why I do not get all non-zero terms and also if there's a way to refine better than I did.
I want to compute the Riemann Tensor of the following metric

$$ds^2 = dr^2+(r^2+b^2)d \theta^2 +(r^2+b^2)\sin^2 \theta d \phi^2 -dt^2$$

Before going through it I'd like to try to predict how many non-trivial components we'd expect to get, based on the Riemann tensor basic rule:

It is antisymmetric in its first and second pairs of indices but symmetric under exchange of these two pairs, i.e.:

$$R_{\mu \nu \rho \sigma}=-R_{\nu \mu \rho \sigma}=-R_{\mu \nu \sigma \rho}=R_{\rho \sigma \mu \nu} \tag 2$$

OK. My conclusions are:

1) Based on ##(2)## I understand that terms with 3 or 4 repeated indices will vanish.

2) Based on ##(2)## and the fact that we're dealing with a diagonal metric, I see that we need to have one index repeated at least twice if we want to get a non-trivial term.

So based on such analysis I get 18 potential non-trivial terms:

$$R_{r \theta r \theta}, \ \ R_{r \phi r \phi}, \ \ R_{\theta \phi \theta \phi}, \ \ R_{r t r t}, \ \ R_{\theta t \theta t}, \ \ R_{\phi t \phi t}, \ \ R_{r \theta r \phi}, \ \ R_{\theta r \theta \phi}, \ \ R_{\phi r \phi \theta}$$ $$R_{ t r t \phi}, \ \ R_{t \theta t \phi}, \ \ R_{\phi \theta \phi t}, \ \ R_{t r t \theta}, \ \ R_{\theta r \theta t}, \ \ R_{\theta \phi \theta t}, \ \ R_{r \theta r t}, \ \ R_{\phi r \phi t}, \ \ R_{r \phi r t} \tag3$$

Note that we can get more than 18 non-trivial terms out of antisymmetry and symmetry operations on these 18 terms.

OK now is time to check this; Mathematica yields (for anyone interested in the code check Artes solution here):

Captura de pantalla (1069).png


Note we get 12 non-trivial terms. And this result includes the terms obtained out of symmetry and antisymmetry operations.

Mmm interesting. I checked every single term in (3) and only these three are non-zero:

$$R_{r \theta r \theta}=\frac{-b^2}{b^2+r^2}$$

$$R_{r \phi r \phi}=\frac{-b^2 \sin^2 (\theta)}{b^2 +r^2}$$

$$R_{\theta \phi \theta \phi}=\frac{b^2 \sin^2 (\theta)}{b^2 +r^2}$$

Besides, note that there's a non-trivial term that I am not getting:

$$R_{? ? ? ?}=\frac{b^2}{(b^2 +r^2)^2}$$

Mmm what am I missing?

Any help is appreciated.

Thank you 😀
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
979
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K