Conceptual question about angular speed and radius for rotational motion

Click For Summary
A wheel's angular speed is influenced by changes in radius when considering constant angular momentum, as a larger radius results in decreased angular frequency due to increased moment of inertia. However, with constant angular acceleration, the angular acceleration remains unchanged regardless of radius. The discussion highlights that a smaller radius allows for greater acceleration under constant force, affecting angular speed. Torque, which shares units with work and energy, plays a crucial role in these dynamics. The relationship between torque and angular motion is emphasized through practical examples, illustrating the physics involved.
FisherDude
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
let's say a wheel rotates with a constant angular acceleration. Would its angular speed be affected if the radius was changed? It seems that angular speed would be independent of the radius since the angle is just a proportional quantity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on your assumptions. For a constant angular momentum, the angular frequency decreases with a larger radius - the moment of... something I can't remember at 5:00AM... gets larger since it's proportional to distance from axis - just like a lever.

On the other hand, for a constant angular acceleration, angular acceleration remains... constant.

Edit: Torque. It has the same units as a moment of whatever I can't remember.
 
Last edited:
so angular speed is dependent on radius since the force that moves the wheel would cause a greater acceleration if the wheel had a smaller radius (meaning it would be a smaller wheel)? also assuming the force that moves the wheel stays constant.
 
Exactly so. Try it yourself, spin around first like a ballerina with your arms extended then like a spinning... cylinder and observe. You will look like a muppet on both accounts but it's all in the name of physics.
 
Thanks.

Btw, i will only look like a muppet if someone is looking.
 
Torque, measured in units of force times length has the same dimension as work or energy. and that is legitimate; turning a shaft exactly one radian of twist (and the radian is the mathematically natural unit of twist) the number of Newton-meters of torque becomes exactly the number of Joules of work done. so with a twist of one radian, torque is the same as energy.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
627
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
19K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K