Question about a Rotating system with mass moving inwards

In summary, the conversation discusses a rotating tube with a moving mass inside. The mass moves towards the center of rotation with varying speeds, but the final velocities of the two cases are the same. This is due to the conservation of angular momentum. The conversation also mentions the use of the Lagrange formalism to derive the equations of motion and a scientific method to calculate the system's behavior with time steps. Additionally, it is noted that energy is not conserved in this scenario and that the use of torque and precalculations can produce accurate and fast results.
  • #1
losbellos
63
0
TL;DR Summary
I have a question. I have a rotating tube like a line that has two end and one of them is the center of rotation (like a watch arrow just tube), and inside the tube a mass that is moving towards the center of rotation...
Dear People,
I have a question. I have a rotating tube like a line that has two end and one of them is the center of rotation (like a watch arrow just tube), and inside the tube a mass that is moving towards the center of rotation. So the masses moving along the line aka along the length of the tube. Both starts to move from the same distance from the center of rotation and has the same rotational velocity. Now I have 2 case:

1, the mass moves inwards to the center of rotation slower
2, the mass moves inwards to the center of rotation faster

Both cases the initial angular velocity is the same. Both of them reaches a specific distance which is the same in both case but of course it takes different times. So is that true that the angular velocity of the system would be the same when the mass reaches the destination which is the same for both cases. So it would not matter how fast they move inwards towards the center the final velocities would be the same at the destination? I mean this is how the kinetic energy preservation aka angular momentum conservation would work right?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'd just derive the equations of motion for the mass inside the tube. It's a nice excercise using the Lagrange formalism!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes malawi_glenn and losbellos
  • #3
vanhees71 said:
I'd just derive the equations of motion for the mass inside the tube. It's a nice excercise using the Lagrange formalism!
Well I am only asking it because this is how I know it. And if I would put into a solver it would be the same. So I would like to know the answer pls.
 
  • #4
losbellos said:
...
1, the mass moves inwards to the center of rotation slower
2, the mass moves inwards to the center of rotation faster

Both cases the initial angular velocity is the same. Both of them reaches a specific distance which is the same in both case but of course it takes different times. So is that true that the angular velocity of the system would be the same when the mass reaches the destination which is the same for both cases. So it would not matter how fast they move inwards towards the center the final velocities would be the same at the destination? I mean this is how the kinetic energy preservation aka angular momentum conservation would work right?
...
I would say that the initial and final velocities would be the same.
For case 1, it would take longer to reach the final velocity than for case 2.
 
  • Like
Likes losbellos
  • #5
losbellos said:
Well I am only asking it because this is how I know it. And if I would put into a solver it would be the same. So I would like to know the answer pls.
The process is irrelevant. The fact that the final configurations are identical and the fact that angular momentum is conserved fixes the final angular velocity regardless of how the final configuration came to be achieved.
 
  • Like
Likes losbellos and Lnewqban
  • #6
vanhees71 said:
I'd just derive the equations of motion for the mass inside the tube. It's a nice excercise using the Lagrange formalism!

jbriggs444 said:
The process is irrelevant. The fact that the final configurations are identical and the fact that angular momentum is conserved fixes the final angular velocity regardless of how the final configuration came to be achieved.
Obvious now. I had such a trauma this weekend some people sent me files that did something else and it was from a very famous simulation package... It doesn't conserve the energy!
 
  • #7
Maybe I misunderstood the problem. So let's do the calculation. Of course it's most convenient to use polar coordinates with ##\varphi=\omega t##, with ##\omega## the angular velocity of the rotating tube. Then
$$\vec{x}=\begin{pmatrix} r \cos(\omega t) \\ r \sin(\omega t)\end{pmatrix}$$
and
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\dot{r} \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\omega t) \\ \sin(\omega t) \end{pmatrix} + \omega r \begin{pmatrix}-\sin(\omega t) \\ cos(\omega t) \end{pmatrix}.$$
The Lagrangian thus is
$$L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2 = \frac{m}{2} (\dot{r}^2+\omega^2 r^2).$$
The equation of motion follows from
$$p_r=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r}}=m \dot{r}, \quad \dot{p}_r=m \ddot{r} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial t} = m \omega^2 r.$$
The general solution is
$$r(t)=r_0 \cosh(\omega t) + \frac{v_0}{\omega} \sinh(\omega t).$$
Now you can plug in any initial condition you like to see, what happens.
 
  • #8
My solution is somehow different. My solution energy conserving and it is not outside of the generally accepted newtonien basic mechanics.

Let me share a scientific method to calculate this with time steps.
The idea here is that whatever amount of energy it has to pass it also has to loose and it is implemented with Toruqe's and precalculations.

FEA calculate the tube torque requirement for reference acceleration. ra
element's mass center
arml = distance x,y
TQtube = TQtube +ra/(r/arml) * arml * element's mass ;

Same for the mass inside at every time step and reference the ra to the mass center of the mass. This means the mass elements away from center will have ra/(mc/element distance) multiplied otherwise divided values.

for inwards motion
TQX
(vt+( TQX/TQtube *ra*ts))/(vm-( TQX/TQmass *ra*ts)) == r/rn(mass center's distance from origo)
Now solve for TQX and you will use it
vt = (vt+( TQX/TQtube *ra*ts))
vm = (vm-( TQX/TQtube *ra*ts))

The resulting velocities always be in tune with the system so the energy too and this tell this too. This also solves that the velocity of the mass inwards direction doesnt matter only the location...

This produces very accurate and fast result with time steps.
 
  • #9
losbellos said:
My solution energy conserving
Energy is not conserved in this scenario. We have some unspecified agency pumping in the energy that draws the two masses closer together in the tube.
 
  • Haha
Likes losbellos
  • #10
Validate your solver it is good!
 
  • #11
losbellos said:
My solution is somehow different. My solution energy conserving and it is not outside of the generally accepted newtonien basic mechanics.

Let me share a scientific method to calculate this with time steps.
The idea here is that whatever amount of energy it has to pass it also has to loose and it is implemented with Toruqe's and precalculations.

FEA calculate the tube torque requirement for reference acceleration. ra
element's mass center
arml = distance x,y
TQtube = TQtube +ra/(r/arml) * arml * element's mass ;

Same for the mass inside at every time step and reference the ra to the mass center of the mass. This means the mass elements away from center will have ra/(mc/element distance) multiplied otherwise divided values.

for inwards motion
TQX
(vt+( TQX/TQtube *ra*ts))/(vm-( TQX/TQmass *ra*ts)) == r/rn(mass center's distance from origo)
Now solve for TQX and you will use it
vt = (vt+( TQX/TQtube *ra*ts))
vm = (vm-( TQX/TQtube *ra*ts))

The resulting velocities always be in tune with the system so the energy too and this tell this too. This also solves that the velocity of the mass inwards direction doesnt matter only the location...

This produces very accurate and fast result with time steps.
What I posted above IS the accepted Newtonian dynamics. Since the Lagrangian is not explicitly time dependent, "energy" is conserved. The Hamiltonian is
$$H=p_r \dot{r}-L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{r}^2 -\frac{m \omega^2}{2} r^2=\text{const}.$$
 
  • #12
jbriggs444 said:
Energy is not conserved in this scenario. We have some unspecified agency pumping in the energy that draws the two masses closer together in the tube.
Thats a wrong understanding of the energy preservation! you are talking about the full value but we are talking about the mass and the tube circumferential velocities and energies.... The two must be the same plus your energy input is perpendicular so if you add that vector there it would not change the value's length to the radius-perpendicular aka velocity vector...
 
  • #13
losbellos said:
kinetic energy preservation aka angular momentum conservation

Not "aka" because these are two different things.
 
  • Haha
Likes losbellos
  • #14
Sorry for my language, so the energy preservation and the conservation of angular momentum is the same in the sense of preserving the systems total energy or angular momentum. Because both mean velocity and masses. But its ok, better to be strict.
 
  • #15
losbellos said:
Sorry for my language, so the energy preservation and the conservation of angular momentum is the same in the sense of preserving the systems total energy or angular momentum. Because both mean velocity and masses. But its ok, better to be strict.
Conservation of angular momentum does not entail conservation of energy. Consider the case where, as here, the moment of inertia of the system can change due to an internal reconfiguration.

The classic example is a spinning skater who pulls in her arms and increases her rotation rate as a result. It takes effort to pull in the arms. That effort manifests as increased mechanical energy.
 
  • #16
jbriggs444 said:
Conservation of angular momentum does not entail conservation of energy. Consider the case where, as here, the moment of inertia of the system can change due to an internal reconfiguration.

The classic example is a spinning skater who pulls in her arms and increases her rotation rate as a result. It takes effort to pull in the arms. That effort manifests as increased mechanical energy.
why do you have to include that into this while I even stated do not! Please read it through!
 
  • #17
losbellos said:
why do you have to include that into this while I even stated do not! Please read it through!
Because your claim that mechanical energy is conserved in this scenario is incorrect.
 
  • #18
There's energy conservation in this scenario. See #11.
 
  • #19
vanhees71 said:
There's energy conservation in this scenario. See #11
Apparently I had trouble with the problem description. So we have a tube anchored to a pivot at one end and a mass projected up the tube rather than a mass drawn up the tube.
 
  • #20
Ok, then I don't understand the problem right either. Of course, in the setup I consider, i.e., a rotating tube with a frictionless moving point mass inside, you have only a centrifugal force outwards, and that's what the Lagrange formalism applied above indeed gives.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444

FAQ: Question about a Rotating system with mass moving inwards

What happens to the angular velocity of a rotating system when a mass moves inward?

When a mass moves inward in a rotating system, the angular velocity of the system increases. This is due to the conservation of angular momentum, which states that the product of the moment of inertia and the angular velocity must remain constant if no external torque is applied.

How does the moment of inertia change when a mass moves inward in a rotating system?

The moment of inertia decreases when a mass moves inward in a rotating system. The moment of inertia depends on the distribution of mass relative to the axis of rotation. As the mass moves closer to the axis, the moment of inertia decreases.

Can you explain the conservation of angular momentum in the context of a rotating system with a mass moving inward?

The conservation of angular momentum states that in the absence of external torques, the total angular momentum of a system remains constant. For a rotating system, this means that if a mass moves inward, reducing the moment of inertia, the angular velocity must increase to keep the product of the moment of inertia and angular velocity constant.

What is the mathematical relationship between angular velocity and moment of inertia in a rotating system?

The mathematical relationship is given by the conservation of angular momentum, which can be expressed as \( L = I \omega \), where \( L \) is the angular momentum, \( I \) is the moment of inertia, and \( \omega \) is the angular velocity. If the moment of inertia \( I \) decreases, the angular velocity \( \omega \) must increase to keep \( L \) constant.

How does the kinetic energy of a rotating system change when a mass moves inward?

The kinetic energy of a rotating system increases when a mass moves inward. The rotational kinetic energy is given by \( \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2 \). As the moment of inertia \( I \) decreases and the angular velocity \( \omega \) increases, the overall kinetic energy increases, assuming no external forces are doing work on the system.

Back
Top