Condensed matter problem with Feynman integral

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the final expression for a particle in a potential coupled to a bath of harmonic oscillators using the Feynman integral approach. Key points include the assumption of periodicity for the variable q on the interval [0,T-1] and the application of Fourier series expansion for q. The transformation of the integral in dt' to an integral in τ via the substitution t' -> -iτ is also highlighted. The Matsubara formalism, as discussed in Fetter and Valecka, is suggested as a reference for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman integrals
  • Knowledge of harmonic oscillators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Fourier series expansion
  • Basic grasp of the Matsubara formalism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Feynman integrals in condensed matter physics
  • Explore the derivation of Fourier series expansions in quantum mechanics
  • Review the Matsubara formalism in Fetter and Valecka's texts
  • Investigate the implications of periodic boundary conditions in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in condensed matter physics, quantum mechanics students, and researchers working on Feynman integrals and harmonic oscillator systems.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Im working on deriving the final expression on the attached picture. The problem is that of a particle in a potential coupled to a "bath" of harmonic oscillators but I'm not sure how you arrive at the final expression. First of all, why are you allowed to assume that q is periodic on the interval [0,T-1]? And secondly how should I use this? Should I plug in the Fourier series expansion of q? And in that case what should I do with the integral in dt' (which I suppose has been transformed to an integral in τ by t'->-iτ)
 

Attachments

  • condensedmatterproblem.png
    condensedmatterproblem.png
    112.3 KB · Views: 525
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you have a look on how the Matsubara formalism works, e.g. in Fetter/ Valecka?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K