Condensed Matter/Solid State Physics/Materials Science?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the distinctions and overlaps between condensed matter physics, solid state physics, and materials science. Participants examine the theoretical and practical aspects of each field, including their focus areas and methodologies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that solid state physics is a branch of condensed matter physics, while others argue that condensed matter encompasses a broader range of topics beyond solid states.
  • One participant describes condensed matter physics as focusing on idealized materials and fundamental phenomena, whereas materials science is more concerned with real-world applications and material properties.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that materials science integrates solid state physics and chemistry but focuses on practical applications rather than theoretical exploration.
  • Some participants note that there is a significant gray area between condensed matter physics and materials science, leading to varying interpretations of their boundaries.
  • A participant with experience in both fields highlights that condensed matter physicists often deal with ideal systems, while materials scientists focus on defects and practical material design.
  • There is mention of specific tools and approaches used in each field, with materials science being described as having an engineering perspective.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between condensed matter physics, solid state physics, and materials science. While some agree on certain overlaps, others maintain that the fields have distinct focuses and methodologies, leaving the discussion unresolved regarding their precise boundaries.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that definitions and interpretations of the fields may vary, and there are unresolved aspects regarding the extent of overlap and the specific focus of each discipline.

mc0210
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I was just wandering what exactly the difference is between the three above areas. From what I understand, solid state physics is a branch of condensed matter. However, would materials science background be very helpful for these areas of study? Any insight would be appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Condensed matter usually refers to things like superconductivity, ferromagnetism, topological insulators/other topological phases (usually under solid state), liquid crystals, granular fluids, polymers (soft matter), bose-einstein condensates, cold atomic gases, among other topics.
Materials science seems to focus more on studying materials in order to make materials with certain properties like certain structural or electrical properties. An example of active research is ferroelectrics, materials that have a spontaneous electric polarization that can be switched by applying an electric field.
 
Thanks for the response! I think its applications are really cool, its just my chemistry is decent, definitely not one of my strengths. Is it a whole lot of chemistry? My current physics teacher is in solid state and I am going to ask him about this area as well.
 
essentially they all tend to look at similar problems, but depending on what you are trying to accomplish each approach has a slightly different tool set. actually, solid sate and condensesd mater are really the same. condensed could be looked at as taking all the lessons from solid state and seeing that they can be applied to a wide range of problems in systems that may or may not be in a perfect solid state. materials science is more of a engineering approach to the problems of how to make a bit of matter do something in particular. so it will more or less come down to do you see your self as a physicist or an engineer?
 
Well at the moment, I definitely align more with the physics. I was curious because I find this to be an interesting field and my school has an engineering physics degree with this as a focus. Thought it could make an interesting combination.
 
From my experience, condensed matter physics tends to look at idealized materials (e.g. near perfect single crystals) and fundamental subjects (e.g. quantum phase transitions at very low temperature physics), whereas materials science is more focused on real-world materials (strained polycrystals full of defects) and very applied questions (how do I make this metal stronger?).

Condensed matter and solid state seems to mean more or less the same, but not all condensed matter is solid.

As always there is a big gray zone in between these subjects that can be either, depending on who you ask.
 
Thanks for the response! It seems pretty clear to me that the two are not as related as I would have thought.
Again, thank you
 
Hey. I did a bachelors in physics (emphasis in solid state) and am now in a PhD program in materials science and engineering. Maybe I can provide some insight.

Condensed matter physics deals physical phenomena in condensed phases of matter (solid phases, liquid phase, superconducting phase, ferromagnetic phase, etc.). Condensed matter physicists try to explain the physical phenomena using mostly quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, and E&M. Solid state physics, the largest branch of condensed matter physics, is concerned with physical phenomena and properties of solids. The emphasis of the research conducted in SS/CM physics is to discover and explain new physical phenomena.

Materials science and engineering is the applied SS/CM physics. Knowledge of SS/CM physics is used to study real world material systems, with the emphasis on practical application. In contrast, physicists are more likely to deal with ideal systems to better study the science behind things. People in MSE also learn more about defects, processing, characterization, etc. in hopes of designing or improving material systems.
 
Basically, Materials Science = Solid State Physics + Solid State Chemistry, but without the theoretical background and focus of either of those. That is, it focuses more on processing, manufacture and characterization of novel materials for real world use than trying to figure out the physico-chemical phenomena of the materials occurring in nature.

Sometimes, materials science may have elements of metallurgy as well, but not always. You are more likely to work with Ellingham diagrams as an MSE major, for example, while a chemist would be looking at something like Latimer or Pourbaix diagram a lot more. The Solid State Physics major would be more concerned with band diagrams in general :) .
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K