Condition such that the symmetric matrix has only positive eigenvalues

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which a symmetric matrix has only positive eigenvalues, focusing on the implications of the determinant and trace of the matrix. The subject area includes linear algebra and matrix theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the characteristic polynomial of a 2x2 symmetric matrix and discuss the conditions for positive eigenvalues, including the determinant and trace. Some participants question the sufficiency of the conditions derived, while others suggest additional criteria for positive definiteness.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the conditions for positive eigenvalues are being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between the determinant and trace, while others are revisiting their calculations and reasoning. There is a recognition of the need for further clarification on the implications of the derived conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the conditions derived must be intersected to find valid restrictions on the parameters involved. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity in determining the sufficiency of the conditions for positive eigenvalues.

songoku
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
det (A - Iλ) = 0
1681048457077.png


My attempt:
$$
\begin{vmatrix}
1-\lambda & b\\
b & a-\lambda
\end{vmatrix}
=0$$
$$(1-\lambda)(a-\lambda)-b^2=0$$
$$a-\lambda-a\lambda+\lambda^2-b^2=0$$
$$\lambda^2+(-1-a)\lambda +a-b^2=0$$
The value of ##\lambda## will be positive if D < 0, so
$$(-1-a)^2-4(a-b^2)<0$$
$$1+2a+a^2-4a+4b^2<0$$
$$a^2-2a+1+4b^2<0$$
$$(a-1)^2+4b^2<0$$

But the LHS of the inequality is always positive so it is not possible for ##(a-1)^2+4b^2## to be less than 0

Where is my mistake? Thanks

Edit: I just realised my mistake. I will revise my working on post #2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The value of ##\lambda## will be positive if:
1.
$$D \geq 0$$
$$(a-1)^2+4b^2 \geq 0 \rightarrow a ~\text{and} ~b \in \mathbb{R}$$

2.
$$\lambda_1 + \lambda_2 > 0$$
$$a+1>0$$
$$a>-1$$

3.
$$\lambda_1 . \lambda_2>0$$
$$a-b^2>0$$
$$a>b^2$$

Intersecting all three conditions, the restriction for a and b is ##a>b^2~,a, b \in \mathbb{R}##

Am I correct? Thanks
 
a &gt; b^2 is the condition that the determinant must be positive. This is necessary for two positive eigenvalues, but it is not sufficient: A positive determinant is also consistent with two negative eigenvalues. So clearly something further is required.

The characteristic equation of a 2x2 matrix A is <br /> \lambda^2 - \operatorname{tr}(A)\lambda + \det A = 0. For a symmetric matrix \begin{pmatrix} a &amp; b \\ b &amp; d \end{pmatrix} we have <br /> \operatorname{tr}^2 - 4\det = (a + d)^2 - 4ad + 4b^2 = (a - d)^2 + 4b^2 \geq 0 showing that the eigenvalues are always real.

Both roots of a quadratic will be positive if the lesser root is, so the condition is <br /> \operatorname{tr}(A) - \sqrt{\operatorname{tr}(A)^2 - 4\det A} \geq 0. Note that if \det A \geq 0 (as it must be for two positive roots) then <br /> 0 \leq \sqrt{\operatorname{tr}(A)^2 - 4 \det A } \leq |\operatorname{tr}(A)| because the square root function is strictly increasing on the positive reals. It follows that \operatorname{tr}(A) - \sqrt{\operatorname{tr}(A)^2 - 4 \det A} has the same sign as \operatorname{tr}(A).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and topsquark
songoku said:
Intersecting all three conditions, the restriction for a and b is ##a>b^2~,a, b \in \mathbb{R}##

Am I correct? Thanks
Hi @songoku. I get the same answer as you though I found your proof difficult to follow.

A symmetric matrix with positive eigenvalues is ‘positive definite’. (Though that's not the definition of positive definiteness.)

If you can use this fact, there are tests for positive definiteness which enable you to answer the question with little effort.

(I’m only a dabbler, so any experts are invited to correct me if this is wrong/misleading.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
pasmith said:
a &gt; b^2 is the condition that the determinant must be positive. This is necessary for two positive eigenvalues, but it is not sufficient: A positive determinant is also consistent with two negative eigenvalues. So clearly something further is required.

The characteristic equation of a 2x2 matrix A is <br /> \lambda^2 - \operatorname{tr}(A)\lambda + \det A = 0. For a symmetric matrix \begin{pmatrix} a &amp; b \\ b &amp; d \end{pmatrix} we have <br /> \operatorname{tr}^2 - 4\det = (a + d)^2 - 4ad + 4b^2 = (a - d)^2 + 4b^2 \geq 0 showing that the eigenvalues are always real.

Both roots of a quadratic will be positive if the lesser root is, so the condition is <br /> \operatorname{tr}(A) - \sqrt{\operatorname{tr}(A)^2 - 4\det A} \geq 0. Note that if \det A \geq 0 (as it must be for two positive roots) then <br /> 0 \leq \sqrt{\operatorname{tr}(A)^2 - 4 \det A } \leq |\operatorname{tr}(A)| because the square root function is strictly increasing on the positive reals. It follows that \operatorname{tr}(A) - \sqrt{\operatorname{tr}(A)^2 - 4 \det A} has the same sign as \operatorname{tr}(A).
I try to solve this condition but I get more or less same result
<br /> \operatorname{tr}(A) - \sqrt{\operatorname{tr}(A)^2 - 4\det A} \geq 0.
$$1+a \geq \sqrt{(1-a)^2+4b^2}$$
$$(1+a)^2 \geq (1-a)^2+4b^2$$
$$1+2a+a^2 \geq 1-2a+a^2+4b^2$$
$$4a \geq 4b^2$$
$$a \geq b^2$$

Intersecting with previous restriction, the answer will be ##a>b^2##

Am I missing something?

Steve4Physics said:
Hi @songoku. I get the same answer as you though I found your proof difficult to follow.

A symmetric matrix with positive eigenvalues is ‘positive definite’. (Though that's not the definition of positive definiteness.)

If you can use this fact, there are tests for positive definiteness which enable you to answer the question with little effort.

(I’m only a dabbler, so any experts are invited to correct me if this is wrong/misleading.)
Do you mean using REF and restricting the pivot position to be positive?

Thanks
 
I also get ## a > b^2 ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
songoku said:
Do you mean using REF and restricting the pivot position to be positive?

Thanks
Yes, that's right. For information, another way is to check that all the ‘leading determinants' are positive.

I’m not sure if ‘leading determinants’ is the correct terminology but for an ##n \times n## matrix with elements ##a_{ij}##, the ‘leading determinants’ are:

##\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11}
\end{vmatrix} ##

##\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12}\\
a_{21} & a_{22}
\end{vmatrix}##

##\begin{vmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13}\\
a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23}\\
a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33}
\end{vmatrix}##

etc.

This is simple in your problem: the 1st determinant (single element) is positive by inspection; the requirement that the 2nd determinant is positive gives the required inequality directly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and malawi_glenn
songoku said:
I try to solve this condition but I get more or less same result
<br /> \operatorname{tr}(A) - \sqrt{\operatorname{tr}(A)^2 - 4\det A} \geq 0.
\begin{split}<br /> 1+a &amp;\geq \sqrt{(1-a)^2+4b^2} \\<br /> (1+a)^2 &amp;\geq (1-a)^2+4b^2 \\<br /> 1+2a+a^2 &amp;\geq 1-2a+a^2+4b^2\\<br /> 4a &amp;\geq 4b^2\\<br /> a &amp;\geq b^2\end{split}

Your problem is that although you know that \det A &gt; 0, you do not know anything about \operatorname{tr}(A). Isolating the root and squaring both sides is not helpful, since (\operatorname{tr} A)^2 cancels, leaving you with \det A &gt; 0, which you already knew. This is why I noted that if \det A &gt; 0 then \sqrt{(\operatorname{tr} A)^2 - 4\det A} &lt; |\operatorname{tr} A|. The consequence is that if \operatorname{tr} A &gt; 2\sqrt{\det A} &gt; 0 then \operatorname{tr} A - \sqrt{(\operatorname{tr} A)^2 - 4\det A} &gt; 0 because we are not subrracting enough from \operatorname{tr} A to make this quantity negative.

It is easier, however, to start with general properties of quadratics.

The roots of \lambda^2 - p\lambda + q = 0 satisfy <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \lambda_1 + \lambda_2 &amp;= p, \\<br /> \lambda_1\lambda_2 &amp;= q. \end{split} If both roots are positive, then p &gt; 0 and q &gt; 0. However, the converse does not hold in general: If p &gt; 0 and q &gt; 0 then the roots are either real and positive or a complex conjugate pair with positive real part. But here we can rule that case out, because we know that the roots are real. Thus the eigenvalues of a 2x2 symmetric matrix will be positive if and only if both the trace and the determinant are positive.

EDIT: It is correct here that if the determinant is positive, then a &gt; b^2 \geq 0, and the trace being positive requires a &gt; -1 which is less strict; I;mnot sure how I mised that.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
I understand. Thank you very much for the help and explanation pasmith, Steve4Physics, malawi_glenn
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K