Confirming Velocity Direction After Inelastic Collision

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving an inelastic collision between two trucks, where the original poster is trying to determine the initial velocity of the less massive truck. The problem includes specific masses and velocities, as well as angles related to the direction of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use conservation of momentum and the Law of Cosines and Sines to find the initial velocity of the second truck. They express confusion regarding the direction of the velocity, which differs from the textbook's answer.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem. Some suggest that the original poster's approach is valid but may have encountered an ambiguous case in the application of the sine law. Others provide hints and guidance on how to reconsider the angles involved in the momentum triangle.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is seeking clarification on whether their calculations or the textbook's answer is correct, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the problem setup or the application of the laws of physics involved.

tobywashere
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I can solve this problem, but I keep getting a different answer from the textbook. I just want to confirm whether I'm wrong or the textbook is wrong.

A truck of mass 2.3 x 104 kg traveling at 15 m/s [51° S of W] collides with a second truck of mass 1.2 x 104 kg. The collision is completely inelastic. The trucks have a common velocity of 11 m/s [35° S of W] after the collision.

Determine the initial velocity of the less massive truck.


Homework Equations



v`(m1 + m2) = v1m1 + v2m2
Cosine law
Sine law

The Attempt at a Solution



P22 = 3850002 +3450002 -2(385000)(345000)cos16°
P2 = 109045
V = P2 / m2
V = 109045 / 1.2 x 104
V = 9.1 m/s
This part of my answer is the same as the textbook's answer. It's the direction of the velocity that differs.

(sin16°)/109045= sinθ/385000
θ = 77°
Since the momentum of the lighter second truck is in the north west quadrant:
180° - (77° + 51°) = 53°
Therefore, the velocity of the second truck is 9.1 m/s [53° N of W]
The textbook says that the velocity is [26° N of W]
Can anyone check if this is right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bummmmmppppp
 
tobywashere: Your answer is incorrect. The textbook is correct. Keep trying.
 
Write the momenta of the bodies before and after collision along X and Y axis
take the unknown velocity as: x(i) +y(j)

Use conservation of momentum separately along X and Y axis!
 
tobywashere: Hint: Your approach in post 1 seemed fairly good, except I currently think it failed because, it just so happened, you ran into the ambiguous case[/color] of the sine law. Try again.
 
tobywashere said:

Homework Statement



I can solve this problem, but I keep getting a different answer from the textbook. I just want to confirm whether I'm wrong or the textbook is wrong.

A truck of mass 2.3 x 104 kg traveling at 15 m/s [51° S of W] collides with a second truck of mass 1.2 x 104 kg. The collision is completely inelastic. The trucks have a common velocity of 11 m/s [35° S of W] after the collision.

Determine the initial velocity of the less massive truck.


Homework Equations



v`(m1 + m2) = v1m1 + v2m2
Cosine law
Sine law

The Attempt at a Solution



P22 = 3850002 +3450002 -2(385000)(345000)cos16°
P2 = 109045
V = P2 / m2
V = 109045 / 1.2 x 104
V = 9.1 m/s
This part of my answer is the same as the textbook's answer. It's the direction of the velocity that differs.

(sin16°)/109045= sinθ/385000
θ = 77°
Since the momentum of the lighter second truck is in the north west quadrant:
180° - (77° + 51°) = 53°
Therefore, the velocity of the second truck is 9.1 m/s [53° N of W]
The textbook says that the velocity is [26° N of W]
Can anyone check if this is right?

The problem is that sin(103°) is the same as sin(77°).

You used the Law of Cosines to find the third side (p2) of the momentum triangle. There's no problem with that.

Then you used the Law Of Sines to find the angle opposite the longest side of the triangle. That can give two possible results, depending upon whether the triangle has an obtuse angle or not.

If you had used the Law of Sines to find the other unknown angle, the angle opposite p1 (345000 kg·m2/s2) that angle cannot be obtuse, since p1 is not the longest side.

Find angle ɸ, which is opposite side p1 using Law of Sines:

(sin16°)/109045 = (sin ɸ)/345000

Then find θ by subtracting ɸ and 16° from 180°.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K