Conformal and non-conformal mappings

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JulieK
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around conformal and non-conformal mappings, particularly focusing on the nature of conformal mappings in relation to analytic and non-analytic functions. Participants explore definitions, properties, and implications of conformal mappings in various mathematical contexts, including Riemannian manifolds.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that conformal mapping is restricted to analytic functions and inquire about mappings applicable to non-analytic functions.
  • There are two proposed definitions of conformal mapping: one as a mapping that locally preserves angles, and another as a complex-valued function that is one-to-one and holomorphic on an open set in ##\mathbb{C}^n##.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the equivalence of the two definitions of conformal mapping.
  • It is noted that analytic functions are conformal away from singularities and are orientation preserving, while angle-preserving maps that reverse orientation are not analytic.
  • A participant discusses the condition for conformality on Riemannian manifolds, stating that a map is conformal if it satisfies a specific metric condition involving the differential of the map.
  • Local conformal equivalence is introduced, with the assertion that a Riemannian manifold is locally conformally flat if its metric is conformally equivalent to the flat metric in a neighborhood around each point.
  • It is mentioned that conformal mappings do not need to occur between manifolds of the same dimension, and the condition for conformality can apply even when the dimensions differ.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of conformal mappings, with no consensus reached on the equivalence of the definitions or the applicability of conformal mappings to non-analytic functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on definitions and the specific contexts in which conformal mappings are considered, particularly in relation to analytic and non-analytic functions, as well as in the framework of Riemannian geometry.

JulieK
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
My understanding is that conformal mapping is restricted to analytic functions.
What sort of mapping (if any) that can be used for non-analytic functions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JulieK said:
My understanding is that conformal mapping is restricted to analytic functions.
What sort of mapping (if any) that can be used for non-analytic functions?
There are two non-equivalent definitions of conformal mapping.

One is as a mapping that locally preserves angles. The other is as a complex-valued function on an open set in ##\mathbb{C}^n## that is one-to-one and holomorphic.

Which one are you asking about?
 
I am not sure they are not equivalent.
However, I am mainly interested in the second.
 
JulieK said:
My understanding is that conformal mapping is restricted to analytic functions.
What sort of mapping (if any) that can be used for non-analytic functions?

Conformal generally means infinitesimally angle preserving. Analytic functions are conformal away from singularities.

Analytic functions are also orientation preserving so an angle preserving map of the plane that reverses orientation will not be analytic.

On Riemannian manifolds a map f:M -> N is conformal if <df(x),df(y)> = g<x,y> where g is a positive function. This condition just says that the map is infinitesimally angle preserving. If f is a diffeomorphism then the pull back metric is said to be conformally equivalent to the original. In general metrics may not be conformally equivalent and each equivalence class is called a conformal structure.

A related idea is that of local conformal equivalence. For instance, a Riemannian manifold is said to be locally conformally flat if around each point there is an open neighborhood where the metric is conformally equivalent to the flat metric. This is true of all 2 dimensional Riemannian manifolds.

A conformal mapping does not have to be between manifolds of the same dimension. The condition, <df(x),df(y)> = g<x,y>, makes sense when M has lower dimension than N. For instance one may ask when a Riemannian manifold can be conformally immersed into another Riemannian manifold.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K