Confused about angular momentum

In summary, the conversation discusses the addition of angular momentum using the sum J = L + S, where J, L, and S are represented by square matrices. The resulting matrices for both terms in the sum will have a dimension of (2l+1)(2s+1) x (2l+1)(2s+1), with the dimensionality being determined by the spaces in which the basis vectors live. The conversation also mentions the use of eigenvectors, specifically those of Lz and L^2, to span the subspace of a given l. However, it is important to be careful when determining which operator a set of eigenvectors is associated with, as it requires finding diagonal matrices.
  • #1
dyn
773
62
Hi. For the angular momentum l=2 case are the L2 and Lz matrices both 5 x 5 matrices with the following eigenvectors ?
## \begin{pmatrix} 1\\0\\0\\0\\0 \end{pmatrix} ## , ## \begin{pmatrix} 0\\1\\0\\0\\0 \end{pmatrix} ## , ## \begin{pmatrix} 0\\0\\1\\0\\0 \end{pmatrix}##,## \begin{pmatrix} 0\\0\\0\\1\\0 \end{pmatrix} ##,## \begin{pmatrix} 0\\0\\0\\0\\1 \end{pmatrix} ##

I am definitely confused about the addition of angular momentum using J = L + S. These are vectors but represented by square matrices ? And also the L and S matrices are usually not even of the same size so how can they be added ? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
dyn said:
These are vectors but represented by square matrices ? And also the L and S matrices are usually not even of the same size so how can they be added ?
The more proper way of writing that sum is ##\mathbf{J} = \mathbf{L}\otimes I + I \otimes \mathbf{S}## where ##I## in the first and second term correspond to the identity matrix in the spin space and orbital angular momentum space, respectively. ##\otimes## denotes kronecker/direct product. The resulting matrices in both terms in that sum will have ##(2l+1)(2s+1) \times (2l+1)(2s+1)## dimension, which determines the dimensionality of the ##J## space.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
How do you get to that dimensionality ? I would have thought the 1st term has the dimensionality of the L matrix and the 2nd term the dimensionality of the S matrix which are usually different.
Ps am I right about the l=2 case ?
 
  • #4
The basis vector ##|l,m \rangle## and ##|s_z \rangle## live in different space, as you have mentioned, therefore if you want to construct a system in which both spaces interact, the new composite basis vector would be given by the direct product from the two constituent spaces, that is ##|l,m \rangle \otimes |s_z\rangle ## and the linear transformations that act on this new space is also constructed by the direct product.

dyn said:
Ps am I right about the l=2 case ?
If you are only working within the l=2 subspace, yes ##L^2## and ##L_z## are 5x5.

dyn said:
with the following eigenvectors ?
## \begin{pmatrix} 1\\0\\0\\0\\0 \end{pmatrix} ## , ## \begin{pmatrix} 0\\1\\0\\0\\0 \end{pmatrix} ## , ## \begin{pmatrix} 0\\0\\1\\0\\0 \end{pmatrix}##,## \begin{pmatrix} 0\\0\\0\\1\\0 \end{pmatrix} ##,## \begin{pmatrix} 0\\0\\0\\0\\1 \end{pmatrix} ##

Eigenvectors of which operator? If for example you have your ##L_z## diagonal, then they are the eigenvectors of ##L_z##, if it's ##L_x## which is diagonal then they are the eigenvectors of ##L_x##. But the general convention is indeed that, we use the eigenvectors of ##L_z## (and ##L^2##) to span the subspace of a given ##l##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dyn
  • #5
Yes these are eigenfunctions of Lz and of L^2.
 
  • #6
my2cts said:
Yes these are eigenfunctions of Lz and of L^2.
Not so quick for taking a conclusion. You have to be careful if you are only given a set of eigenvectors in matrix form such as those above. To know which operator (in matrix form), a given set of standard basis vectors (vectors with one element being unity while the rest are zeros such as those above) are eigenvectors of, one has to find one or more matrices which are diagonal. It will be of different issue if you are given already in ket form, namely ##|l,m \rangle##'s, they are certainly the eigenvectors of ##L_z## and ##L^2## because our convention has reserved the number ##m##'s to be the eigenvalues of ##L_z##.
 

FAQ: Confused about angular momentum

1) What is angular momentum?

Angular momentum is a measure of the rotational motion of an object, and is defined as the product of an object's moment of inertia and its angular velocity. It is a conserved quantity, meaning it remains constant unless acted upon by an external torque.

2) How is angular momentum different from linear momentum?

Linear momentum is a measure of an object's motion in a straight line, while angular momentum is a measure of an object's rotational motion. Linear momentum is defined as the product of an object's mass and its velocity, while angular momentum is defined as the product of an object's moment of inertia and its angular velocity.

3) What factors affect angular momentum?

The two main factors that affect angular momentum are the moment of inertia and the angular velocity of an object. The moment of inertia depends on an object's mass distribution and the axis of rotation, while the angular velocity is determined by the speed and direction of an object's rotation.

4) How is angular momentum conserved in a system?

Angular momentum is conserved in a system when there is no external torque acting on the system. This means that the total angular momentum of the system remains constant, even if the individual objects within the system may have changes in their angular momenta.

5) What are some real-world applications of angular momentum?

Angular momentum has many practical applications in engineering and physics, such as in the design of vehicles like cars and airplanes, as well as in the study of celestial bodies and their movements. It is also used in sports, such as in the spinning of a figure skater or the throwing of a frisbee.

Similar threads

Back
Top